[E-trademarks] Suggested update to trademark filing system

[Rebecca Brandau]

Why in the world would they require that if we are not required to prove use with an item for everything listed in a given class?  Has that changed also?
 
/Rebecca J. Brandau, Esq./
Brandau & Associates, LLC
1960 N. Ridge Rd.
Vermilion, OH  44089
314-973-8669 Mobile
440-986-1833 Office
Rebecca at BrandauLaw.com mailto:Rebecca at BrandauLaw.comhttp://www.BrandauLaw.com
 
Licensed in Missouri and Ohio
 
 

> On 03/15/2025 9:52 AM EDT Dale Quisenberry via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> 100%
> 
>  
> 
> C. Dale Quisenberry
> 
> Quisenberry Law PLLC
> 
> 13910 Champion Forest Drive, Suite 203
> 
> Houston, Texas 77069
> 
> (832) 680.5000 (office)
> 
> (832) 680.1000 (mobile)
> 
> (832) 680.5555 (facsimile)
> 
> www.quisenberrylaw.com http://www.quisenberrylaw.com
> 
>  
> 
> This email may contain information that is confidential and subject to the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine and other applicable privileges.  This email is intended to be received only by those to whom it is specifically addressed.  Any receipt of this email by others is not intended to and shall not waive any applicable privilege.  If you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by separate email.  Thank you.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: Keller, Scott <SKeller at wnj.com>
> Date: Saturday, 15 March 2025 at 8:33 am
> To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Cc: Dale Quisenberry <dale at quisenberrylaw.com>
> Subject: RE: [E-trademarks] Suggested update to trademark filing system
> 
> Dale,
> 
>  
> 
> I just had the same thing yesterday.  I think I had 20 items I needed to check.  Very inefficient and what if you inadvertently forget to check one.  Another problem with the new system that already takes a lot longer than the former system.
> 
>  
> 
> R. Scott Keller | Partner
> Warner Norcross + Judd LLP
> 1500 Warner Building, 150 Ottawa Ave N.W., Grand Rapids, MI 49503
> d 616.752.2479 | m 616.485.9975 | skeller at wnj.com mailto:skeller at wnj.com | profile http://www.wnj.com/scott_keller | V-Card http://www.wnj.com/Attorney/VCard.vcf?AttorneyID=2189
> 
> This email and any attachments are solely for the confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or act in reliance on it or any attachments. If you received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by email, and promptly delete this email and any attachments.
> 
> The attorney-client and work product privileges are not waived by the transmission of this email.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Dale Quisenberry via E-trademarks
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2025 9:18 AM
> To: Crane, Susan via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Cc: Dale Quisenberry <dale at quisenberrylaw.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [E-trademarks] Suggested update to trademark filing system
> 
>  
> 
> This may have already been discussed, but I’m noticing when filing a 1(a) application and uploading a specimen, we are asked to check a box beside each good or service listed below to which the specimen applies, but there is no place to check a box that says all of the goods/services listed below.  If there is a long list of goods/services, then it can be unnecessarily time consuming to manually check each box.  Does anyone know if this has been brought to the USPTO’s attention and request that this feature be added?
> 
>  
> 
> C. Dale Quisenberry
> 
> Quisenberry Law PLLC
> 
> 13910 Champion Forest Drive, Suite 203
> 
> Houston, Texas 77069
> 
> (832) 680.5000 (office)
> 
> (832) 680.1000 (mobile)
> 
> (832) 680.5555 (facsimile)
> 
> www.quisenberrylaw.com https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.quisenberrylaw.com&d=DwMF-g&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=yV0E-VQXakTTVf0sTjju2w&m=m29S30EHDTErj91wVoAgA_k7hN9cVq0_DWEc6TT5oGx3sqtgGLYCjPj20-Hn2ifi&s=EPItiqXPeOqGLn_nNSu_fWAD5yjbp0d_R5IJpLiublg&e=
> 
>  
> 
> This email may contain information that is confidential and subject to the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine and other applicable privileges.  This email is intended to be received only by those to whom it is specifically addressed.  Any receipt of this email by others is not intended to and shall not waive any applicable privilege.  If you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by separate email.  Thank you.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250316/bb1873b8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250316/bb1873b8/attachment.jpg>