[E-trademarks] Fraudulent, forged assignment filed

[Scott Landsbaum]

Out of curiosity, what would be the process for challenging a fraudulent
assignment recorded with the USPTO?  Is there a Board proceeding for that
or is it a civil suit?

Regards,
Scott

Scott Landsbaum, Inc.
323-314-7881 / f 323-714-2454
8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420, Beverly Hills, CA  90211
www.scottlandsbaum.com / www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/

NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals to
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute
it or any of the information it contains.  Please delete it immediately and
notify us by return email or by telephone at (323) 314-7881.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any discussion of tax matters contained in
this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral or other written
communication is not intended to be used and cannot be used for the purpose
of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in connection with the promotion,
marketing or recommendation of any of the matters addressed in the
communication.


On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 4:40 PM voyer--- via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> If fraud _easy_ to prove, might suggesting to fraudester to withdraw
> application etc satisfy.
> If not easy to prove, . . . .
>
> Daniel Kegan
> Kennett Sq PA
>
> On Mar 24, 2025, at 7:17 PM, Welch, John L. via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I am about to oppose an application in which the applicant submitted a
> fraudulent, forged assignment of my client’s registration in order to
> overcome a Section 2(d) refusal.
> We can surely plead a fraud claim in the notice of opposition, but is
> there a faster way to bring this to the attention of the USPTO? Would a
> letter to the Solicitor’s office get us anywhere?
> Thx
>
> JLW
>
>
>
> <image001.png>
> *John L. Welch*
> *Senior Counsel*
> Admitted to Practice: Massachusetts, New York, and Washington, DC
> jwelch at WolfGreenfield.com
> TEL. 617.646.8285
> <image002.jpg> <http://thettablog.blogspot.com/>
> *Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.*
> BOSTON | NEW YORK | WASHINGTON DC
>
> wolfgreenfield.com <https://www.wolfgreenfield.com/>  <image003.png>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/wolf-greenfield/> <image004.png>
> <https://twitter.com/wolfgreenfield>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
>
> *This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify me immediately by replying to this message and destroy all copies of
> this message and any attachments. Thank you.*
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250324/58edf098/attachment.htm>