[E-trademarks] change in frequency?

[daniel at keganlaw.com]

I’d wonder why the goods/services description was so limited at final application ok.
Might there have been, and still be, issues that ought to be considered?


Daniel Kegan
KeganLaw * Counsel to Counsel™ * 
We identify, develop, and protect intangible business assets and
counsel other professionals on legal issues.
Balanced Counsel for Smart Clients®
29 Kendal Drive
Kennett Square PA 19348 USA
847=452-2599
<daniel at keganlaw.com>

> On Oct 1, 2025, at 1:15 PM, Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> A listserv member writes:
> Looking for citations supporting the position that a change in frequency or volume (e.g., change "monthly" to "daily", or "by the gallon" to "by the pint") of a product is a permissible limitation of the ID, and would be permissible in a Section 7 amendment request.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251001/ce1b41ba/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251001/ce1b41ba/attachment.p7s>