[E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: TM Searching Alternatives

Tue Oct 28 18:59:21 UTC 2025

how does it compare to action responder?

JACLYN IONIN, ESQ.
Owner, Principal Attorney, Ionin Law
<https://www.facebook.com/ioninlaw> <https://www.instagram.com/ioninlaw/>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ioninlaw/> <https://calendly.com/ioninlaw>
  Trademark & Business Law
  646.470.1167
  www.ioninlaw.com
  31 Hudson Yards, FL 11 New York, NY 10001
<https://maps.google.com/?q=31%20Hudson%20Yards,%20FL%2011%20New%20York,%20NY%2010001>
[image: App Banner Image]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:49 PM Alex Butterman via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> I’ll second the TMTKO endorsement. TMTKO just added one more useful
> tool:
>
> *2(d) Refusal Drafting Tool*
>
>
>
> “Now, TM TKO has pulled everything together in one place, with one click.
> Our smart new 2(d) response drafting tool generates evidence-rich
> responses, contextually appropriate arguments, and even references other
> applicants who successfully overcame 2(d) refusals on similar facts.”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Alex Butterman*
>
> Partner
>
> *DUNLAP* <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>  <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>
> *BENNETT* <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>  <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>*&*
> <https://www.dbllawyers.com/> <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>*LUDWIG*
> <https://www.dbllawyers.com/>
>
> *211 Church St., SE; Leesburg, VA 20175*
>
> T: 703-777-7319  *BIO*
> <https://www.dbllawyers.com/attorney/alex-butterman/>
>
> [image: A blue and yellow sign with a letter r AI-generated content may be
> incorrect.]
>
> [image: A blue and white sign AI-generated content may be incorrect.]
> <https://www.dbllawyers.com/empowering-innovators/>
>
>
> This electronic message contains information from Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig
> PLLC and may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or use of the contents is prohibited.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete the
> message without copying or disclosing it.
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Suzann Moskowitz via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:21 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Suzann Moskowitz <suzann at themoskowitzfirm.com>
> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [E-trademarks] TM Searching Alternatives
>
>
>
> I’m a big fan of TMTKO.com and (other than a strong search tool) its
> subscription includes many useful tools for Office Action responses and
> monitoring.  They offer a free month trial too.
>
>
>
> Suzann Moskowitz
> The Moskowitz Firm®
>
> www.themoskowitzfirm.com
>
>
>
> *This email may contain information that is private, confidential, and/or
> privileged. Please delete this message if you are not the intended
> recipient. This email is not and should not be construed to be or contain a
> legal opinion. *
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Simor Moskowitz via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2025 8:54 AM
> *To:* e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> *Cc:* Simor Moskowitz <SMoskowitz at WHDA.com>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] TM Searching Alternatives
>
>
>
> I have been using Corsearch for trademark searching for at least 30+ years
> and it has become very expensive. I remember when an annual subscription
> was $4000+/-, and was recently quoted @ $9000 with a discount offered to
> $8500 for an annual Trademark Office search subscription.
>
>
>
> I am looking for an alternative other than Boolean searches in the USPTO
> database.
>
>
>
> I have seen the companies that  advertise/exhibit at INTA, and also
> receive frequent email solicitations.
>
>
>
> So, although I am generally aware of what alternatives are available, I am
> looking for recommendations based upon price/value and quality/scope of
> search results for PTO (and also for full common law) searches.
>
>
>
> Also, if anyone is willing to share their search fee structure, that would
> be great — maybe my fees have not kept up, and Corsearch is not as
> expensive as I perceive.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your recommendations and insight.
>
>
>
> Simor
>
> .........................................................
>
> Simor L. Moskowitz
>
> Westerman, Hattori, LLP
>
> 8500 Leesburg Pike, Suite 7500
>
> Tysons, VA 22182
>
> *(240) 731-0609 (cell)*
>
> 703) 827-3803 (DD)
>
> (703) 827-3800 (main)
>
> (571) 395-8753 (fax)
>
> smoskowitz at whda.com
>
> (Member DC and MD Bars)
>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251028/67cfa04b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251028/67cfa04b/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 27821 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251028/67cfa04b/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43331 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251028/67cfa04b/attachment-0002.png>