[Patentcenter] Published version of us patent applications no longer identical to what was filed (experimental use of AI at PTO)?

[Jeffrey Semprebon]

May be innocuous, but it's a change from the correct term to an incorrect
term. As Carl explained back in 2017, the number that includes the series
code and slash mark does not meet the definition of a "serial number":
https://blog.oppedahl.com/serial-number-application-number/


On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Richard Schafer via Patentcenter <
patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> .[snip] changing “Pat. App. No. nn/nnn.nnn” to “Pat. App. Ser. No.
> nn/nnn,nnn” is innocuous,
>


-Jeff

Jeffrey E. Semprebon
Semprebon Patent Services
www.semprebonps.com
72 Myrtle Street
Claremont, New Hampshire 03743
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240430/d02c8954/attachment.htm>