[Patentpractice] "Perfection in Translations"

[Lou Puls]

One example for discussion *:* Is it REALLY "perfect" -- or is it wishful
thinking?



In the attempt to approach "translation perfection" related to US patent
applications or other international patent documents, the use of AI-ML-NN
(whether a "chatBot-language model" or any other digitally-limited
machine-language model) to reduce costs without the *grammatical* input of
a native speaker to help ensure the internationally-accepted *legal*
meaning of its *technical interpretation* is purely *irrational *with
regard to any litigation relevance. The ongoing pervasive effort to replace
human intelligence in general with digital software and its omnipresent
vulnerability to (often blatantly "hallucinatory" and certainly never
"perfectly" immunizable) human error marches onward in far too many domains
of influence.


Respectfully expecting discussion,

Lou Puls, Ph.D., Patent Agent

Museion Research, a Colorado nonprofit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231201/f811869d/attachment.htm>