[Patentpractice] New Examiner?

Katherine Koenig katherine at koenigipworks.com
Tue Dec 5 20:42:17 EST 2023


Hi everyone,

I'm prosecuting a US-inbound case for a mechanical product.  I've had a terrible go with the Examiner, who appears to be steered by his SPE's opinion about the case.  According to PatentBots, the Examiner has a 64% 3-year grant rate (slightly lower than his art unit) and his SPE has a 0% 3-year grant rate (slightly lower than [insert villain here]).  The client is an FA, and he and his client are both really hoping for a better chance of patentability.

My understanding is that there's no way to request a different Examiner, and even DIVs, CONs, and CIPs are likely to be assigned to the same Examiner.  The only way to get a different Examiner is to present claims that would move the application to a different art unit.  Is this correct?  I hope someone has a magic strategy that I don't know about!

Statistically, does the PTAB uphold a rejection more often than it reverses?  Any input or suggestions would be welcome, thank you!

Best regards,

Katherine

Dr. Katherine Koenig
Registered Patent Attorney
Koenig IP Works, PLLC
2208 Mariner Dr.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
(954) 903-1699
katherine at koenigipworks.com<mailto:katherine at koenigipworks.com>

[cid:image001.png at 01DA27BA.3656F600]
Targeted Intellectual Property Strategy

The information contained in this communication, including any attachments, is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, do not read it.  Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then destroy all paper and electronic copies.  Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231206/b35de03a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7679 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231206/b35de03a/attachment.png>


More information about the Patentpractice mailing list