[Patentpractice] "advance" Inventor Declaration in Employment Contracts
Suzannah K. Sundby
suzannah at canadylortz.com
Tue Dec 3 16:50:51 UTC 2024
Maybe put in the employment contract a monetary penalty, e.g., 1000 USD, if an inventor does not timely execute and return (e.g., within 2 weeks) declaration forms and other documents and information (per instance) for any invention the employee is obligated to assign to employer...
Then one can waive that clause in front of an inventor who refuses to sign... might be sufficient motivation.
Suzannah K. Sundby<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/> | Partner
canady + lortz LLP<http://www.canadylortz.com/>
1050 30th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
T: 202.486.8020
F: 202.540.8020
suzannah at canadylortz.com<mailto:suzannah at canadylortz.com>
www.canadylortz.com<http://www.canadylortz.com/>
Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you may not read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message or any part. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Timothy Snowden via Patentpractice
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 11:44 AM
To: Robert Sayre via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Timothy Snowden <Timothy at thompsonpatentlaw.com>
Subject: Re: [Patentpractice] "advance" Inventor Declaration in Employment Contracts
Sensitivity: Confidential
RE: Declaration I'm not sure it would be helpful, since they can't declare that they invented something they didn't know yet they would invent? Substitute declaration practice is pretty straightforward if you have the assignment.
I like the idea of a short form. Curious to see what other people think about it.
________________________________
From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> on behalf of Allen Richter (allenr--- via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 10:16 AM
To: Robert Sayre via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com<mailto:allenr at richterpatent.com>) <allenr at richterpatent.com<mailto:allenr at richterpatent.com>>
Subject: [Patentpractice] "advance" Inventor Declaration in Employment Contracts
Dear all,
Employees sometimes refuse to sign assignments, in which case an employment contract stating that all future inventions are hereby assigned to the employer, may be of help.
In rare cases inventors refuse to sign inventor declarations. Would it make sense/ eventually be helpful to have "advance Inventor Declaration" clause in an employment contract?
Allen
European, Swiss & Israeli Patent Attorney
RICHTER SHIMONI PATENT ATTORNEYS
www.richterpatent.com<http://www.richterpatent.com>
4 Oppenheimer Street | Ogen Tower B | 6th Floor | 7670104 Rehovot | Israel
IL: +972-(0)54-527 3417 | +972-(0)8-68 999 61 | CH: +41-(0)22-508 7033
This e-mail as well as any attached document contains information which is confidential and that may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this in error, please inform us immediately by return e-mail, facsimile or by telephone and delete this e-mail. Please note that all opinions and/or conclusions expressed herein are preliminary and merely represent our analysis of the facts as known and/or presented to us and are not to be viewed or relied upon as conclusive and/or as a prediction of the outcome of any current or future litigation or other controversy. While email correspondence is very practical, we remind you that emails sent to our firm are not deemed to be received until you have obtained an acknowledgement of receipt (e.g., by return email).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/cec0717e/attachment.html>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list