[Patentpractice] Questions about tools for AI-assisted patent drafting & prosecution

[Irving Fishman]

Allen:

For testing purposes, I would suggest you stick to using recently issued patents that are those of your clients that do not have a lot of art listed on the patent so as t avoid getting client approval or getting into a morass of information that would require you to do stuff in one of your current cases (IDS for clearly relevant stuff).  By using a non-client issued patent, you have the ultimate patent text to compare to in a drafting situation and you have office actions to which you could construct responses and compare to what was actually done in the case for comparison with the least amount of impact any of your own client files.


Irving M. Fishman
Registered US Patent Attorney
89 Headquarters Plaza
Suite 1422, North Tower
Morristown, NJ 07960
(Mobile) 201-602-7122
(Office) 973-285-1548
e-mail (primary):  ifishman at irvfishmanlaw.com<mailto:ifishman at irvfishmanlaw.com>
e-mail (backup) Fishmanirving at gmail.com<mailto:Fishmanirving at gmail.com>

From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Allen Richter (allenr--- via Patentpractice
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 2:46 AM
To: patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
Cc: Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com) <allenr at richterpatent.com>; Orin Leibson <orinl at richterpatent.com>
Subject: [Patentpractice] Questions about tools for AI-assisted patent drafting & prosecution
Sensitivity: Confidential

Dear Listmates,

I have been wondering if someone in this group has tried or at least been given a demo of one of the AI-assisted drafting & prosecution tools.

If yes, what are your key takeaways? My key takeaway from a demo I have just attended: these tools require a great invention disclosure.

If I considered testing one of those tools for a select number of cases, would you recommend obtaining advance consent from the client?

Are there any guidelines /recommendations you could refer me to (e.g., provided by AIPLA)?

If yes, what should such letter to the client cover?

As always, looking forward to receiving your invaluable feedback.

Thanks in advance,

Allen
European, Swiss & Israeli Patent Attorney
RICHTER SHIMONI PATENT ATTORNEYS
www.richterpatent.com<http://www.richterpatent.com>
4 Oppenheimer Street | Ogen Tower B | 6th Floor | 7670104 Rehovot | Israel
IL: +972-(0)54-527 3417 | +972-(0)8-68 999 61 | CH: +41-(0)22-508 7033

This e-mail as well as any attached document contains information which is confidential and that may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this in error, please inform us immediately by return e-mail, facsimile or by telephone and delete this e-mail. Please note that all opinions and/or conclusions expressed herein are preliminary and merely represent our analysis of the facts as known and/or presented to us and are not to be viewed or relied upon as conclusive and/or as a prediction of the outcome of any current or future litigation or other controversy. While email correspondence is very practical, we remind you that emails sent to our firm are not deemed to be received until you have obtained an acknowledgement of receipt (e.g., by return email).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241217/24f236a5/attachment.html>