[Patentpractice] USPTO employees ordered to "return to office"

[Roger Browdy]

What if they all come back?  There is probably office space for about 20% of them.

Roger L. Browdy
Partner
_____________________________________________
FisherBroyles, LLP
direct: +1 202-277-5198
roger.browdy at fisherbroyles.com<mailto:roger.browdy at fisherbroyles.com>
www.fisherbroyles.com<http://www.fisherbroyles.com/>

The information contained in this e-mail message is only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.



From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Vic Indiano via Patentpractice
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 5:57 PM
To: For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Vic Indiano <gadgetlawyer at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Patentpractice] USPTO employees ordered to "return to office"

My cousin is with NIH and got the same letter

It really stinks.  The better examiners will find jobs as patent agents or attorneys or else retire



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.onelink.me_107872968-3Fpid-3Dnativeplacement-26c-3DGlobal-5FAcquisition-5FYMktg-5F315-5FInternal-5FEmailSignature-26af-5Fsub1-3DAcquisition-26af-5Fsub2-3DGlobal-5FYMktg-26af-5Fsub3-3D-26af-5Fsub4-3D100000604-26af-5Fsub5-3DEmailSignature-5F-5FStatic-5F&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&m=Qp15uMtwplpyngxGsOy9Ls7_A9KMawEBYtELaOdaRdmqkfMH6oJHUeFKCLna3nDx&s=kz-1jBtVAuUaLy17spcAMAisXMdNV5XJFB3NK8Fj2tY&e=>


On Friday, January 24, 2025, 5:53 PM, Jim Larsen via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:

Was just talking to an examiner who received an email while on the phone ordering all USPTO employees to “return to office” due to new DOE mandates.  I suspect this is going to disrupt things.



Best regards,

-Jim

James C. Larsen
Attorney
Larsen IP PLLC
p: 425.298.6846
e: jim at Larsen-IP.com<mailto:jim at Larsen-IP.com>
w. www.Larsen-IP.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.Larsen-2DIP.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&m=Qp15uMtwplpyngxGsOy9Ls7_A9KMawEBYtELaOdaRdmqkfMH6oJHUeFKCLna3nDx&s=K6YwdKgyokLce9kQ6f8fHYHzdjy8T4NOPZTDQA7_AmA&e=>

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email, including any attachments, is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named herein. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or authorized agent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Unintended recipients are requested to notify the sender immediately and to permanently delete this e-mail, any attachments, and copies.


--
Patentpractice mailing list
Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_patentpractice-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&m=Qp15uMtwplpyngxGsOy9Ls7_A9KMawEBYtELaOdaRdmqkfMH6oJHUeFKCLna3nDx&s=kKqF70Qouk5gnbUuMdlUJWohuzRw5C7JJghYwdPCEu8&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250126/f10c1ce4/attachment.html>