[Patentpractice] Please remove me from the list.

[Paul Keating]

Thanks Tim!!

Paul Keating

On 21 Mar 2025, at 13:29, Tim Ackermann <tim at ackermannlaw.com> wrote:


Paul, congratulations on the retirement.
The unsubscribe feature is at the link below.
https://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
Tim

Tim Ackermann
The Ackermann Law Firm

E:  tim at ackermannlaw.com<mailto:tim at ackermannlaw.com>
P:  817.305.0690
F:  214.453.0810
W: ackermannlaw.com<http://ackermannlaw.com>
O: 1701 W. Northwest Hwy. Ste. 100
     Grapevine TX 76051

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 03:30 Paul Keating via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
Hi Carl,

With some sadness I ask again that you remove my name from the list.  I am retired and no longer practicing.

Thanks

Paul Keating

Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> on behalf of Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 1:38:43 PM
To: For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com<mailto:carl at oppedahl.com>>
Subject: Re: [Patentpractice] Patentcrapper saying "viewed by" when it hasn't been viewed

On 3/20/2025 3:48 AM, Dan Feigelson via Patentpractice wrote:

Maybe someone else has written about this and I've forgotten, if so I apologize.

Filed a provisional application. PTO issued the filing receipt, along with the "welcome letter". I downloaded the receipt but didn't touch the welcome letter. But PC is showing both the filing receipt and welcome letter as having been viewed by me.

Yet another nice touch from the USPTO.

When PAIR was new, they started out this way, wrongly saying a document had been viewed when this was false.  I called them on it, and they changed it so that it would tell the truth about what had actually been viewed.

So yes if Patent Center is lying about what has been viewed (saying that more things were supposedly viewed than were actually viewed) then it will be important to call them on it.  This is new ticket CP211<https://patentcenter-tickets.oppedahl.com/#CP211>.


--
Patentpractice mailing list
Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250321/591b213f/attachment.html>