[Patentpractice] Revision of Party in Interest in IPR

[steve at hoffberglaw.com]

If this is an actual issue in the case, a deposition may be in order.  The
PTAB is stingy on discovery, so the request needs to be well thought out.
However, since the discovery is limited, any actual smoking gun will stand
out, and may put Petitioner on the defensive.

Very truly yours,

Steven M. Hoffberg
Hoffberg & Associates
29  Buckout Road
West Harrison, NY 10604
(914) 949-2300 tel
(845) 625-2547 fax
steve at hoffberglaw.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/hoffberg/

Emails and attachments received from us may be confidential and/or protected
by the attorney-client privilege, as attorney work-product or based on other
privileges or provisions of law. If you are not designated as an intended
recipient of this email, do not read, copy, use, forward or disclose the
email or any of its attachments to others. Instead, immediately notify the
sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system. We
strictly prohibit any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
of emails or attachments sent by us to other than the intended recipient.
This communication does not create any legal obligations on behalf of the
sender, unless executed in a manner indicating an intent to be bound.

-----Original Message-----
From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf
Of Randall Svihla via Patentpractice
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:52 PM
To: For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Randall Svihla <rsvihla at nsiplaw.com>
Subject: Re: [Patentpractice] Revision of Party in Interest in IPR

Maybe this will help:

https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/ip-newsflash/delay-in-correcting-
disclosure-of-real-parties-in-interest-not-procedurally-fatal-to-ipr-petitio
n

Best regards,

Randall S. Svihla
NSIP Law
Washington, D.C.


-----Original Message-----
From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf
Of Stanley H. Kremen via Patentpractice
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:45 PM
To: patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
Cc: Stanley H. Kremen <shk at shk-dplc.com>
Subject: [Patentpractice] Revision of Party in Interest in IPR

Colleagues:

Currently, I am defending a patent in an IPR. A trial was instituted, and I
replied to the petition. The Petitioner recently changed the identity of the
real party in interest. Is this allowed?

Stanley (Stan) Kremen

Sent from my iPhone
-- 
Patentpractice mailing list
Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com

-- 
Patentpractice mailing list
Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com