[Pct] Notification/reporting correspondence to clients - PDF vs. email body

Gerry Peters gerrypeters at jttpatent.com
Wed Feb 14 21:58:26 EST 2024


Those are good points, Krista, but I think there is at least one case
(federal case against Snowden's email provider) in which US government
took position that there can be no expectation of privacy where 3rd
party service such as email or fax service is used (ridiculous
position but it is what it is). Conversely, where US government
requires secrecy, I remember seeing regulations specifying exactly what
sort of end-to-end encryption is sufficient (3rd party service provider
can't have ability to decrypt). While you make a good point about
timestamps and recordkeeping if your goal is to persuade a court your
client is entitled to privilege, if possession is 9/10's of the law
and privilege belongs to the client, it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling
to know that there is no 3rd party that can be pressured to betray
its users. Also, besides privilege, there is the issue of keeping
material secret until a foreign filing license has issued, and for
that I think plaintext email or any email that can be decrypted by a
3rd party is probably insufficient where communications are happening
internationally or with potential access by noncitizens.
	---Gerry




More information about the Pct mailing list