[Patentcenter] USPTO timestamp

Mon Nov 6 22:42:44 UTC 2023

Thanks 😊

I’ve checked Word and my date and time are set to my time zone. So I don’t know what is going on.

With your issue, unfortunately, I’ve noticed the “status” date has mostly differed from the last action in documents and transactions.

From: Patentcenter <patentcenter-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Sandra L Etherton via Patentcenter
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 5:22 PM
To: patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com; 'Randall Svihla' <rsvihla at nsiplaw.com>
Cc: Sandra L Etherton <sandra at ethertonlaw.com>
Subject: Re: [Patentcenter] USPTO timestamp

External Email - Use Caution

________________________________
Don’t feel silly. Patent Center is making us question a lot of stuff. Today I looked up a just-issued office action for a pending patent application in Patent Center. The office action was emailed today, Nov 6, 2023, but the “status” says it was mailed Nov 2, 2023. Obviously this affects the due date for the response. And there was zero activity in documents or transactions on Nov2.

However, I checked PAIR and it too showed the same inconsistent status date (once I finally got in after getting the “search limit reached” error message – twice).

So, has the “status” date always differed from the last action in documents and transactions? I don’t know, but it’s Patent Center that made me wonder.

Sandra

______________________

Sandra L Etherton
Registered U.S. Patent Attorney

ETHERTON LAW GROUP, LLC
tel: (602) 681-3331 | fax:  (602) 681-3339
email: sandra at ethertonlaw.com<mailto:sandra at ethertonlaw.com>

www.ethertonlaw.com<http://www.ethertonlaw.com>

From: Patentcenter [mailto:patentcenter-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com] On Behalf Of Watt, Rachel S. via Patentcenter
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 3:09 PM
To: Randall Svihla <rsvihla at nsiplaw.com<mailto:rsvihla at nsiplaw.com>>; patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Watt, Rachel S. <Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com<mailto:Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com>>
Subject: Re: [Patentcenter] USPTO timestamp

EBC doesn’t know, maybe that’s new. But now I’m wondering if that is my version of Word that inserted the timestamp. I feel a bit silly.

From: Randall Svihla <rsvihla at nsiplaw.com<mailto:rsvihla at nsiplaw.com>>
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 5:03 PM
To: patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Watt, Rachel S. <Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com<mailto:Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com>>
Subject: RE: USPTO timestamp

External Email - Use Caution

________________________________
Hi, Rachel

Obviously they are using GMT.  Why are they using GMT?  The system they are using to check the DOCX document for errors must be running on GMT.  Maybe it's in the UK or Ireland?  Although I would think foreign export laws would prevent that.  As far as how does it affect the filing date, who knows?  Call the EBC and ask them.

Good luck.

Randall S. Svihla
NSIP Law
Washington, D.C.

From: Patentcenter <patentcenter-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentcenter-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of Watt, Rachel S. via Patentcenter
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 4:48 PM
To: users of Patentcenter <patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Watt, Rachel S. <Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com<mailto:Rwatt at hodgsonruss.com>>
Subject: [Patentcenter] USPTO timestamp

I’m filing an application in docx format. Looking at the USPTO feedback document, their timestamp on their comments is 5 hours ahead (I’m in EST).

[cid:image001.png at 01DA10D8.A4791530]

Is this an issue? What if I was filing at 11:00 pm EST?

    This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege or otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If this message has been received by you in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

    This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege or otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If this message has been received by you in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

         In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that unless otherwise expressly stated, any discussion of a 
federal tax issue in this communication or in any attachment is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties.
         This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege or otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any 
disclosure, copying, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If this message has been received by you in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231106/81d74b34/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5764 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231106/81d74b34/attachment.png>