[E-trademarks] Reviewing ChatGPT Documents

[Scott Landsbaum]

Twice now a client has asked me to review a draft document that the client
had ChatGPT write.  I find this offensive, but I'm not sure if I should.
Have you encountered this?  Are you agreeing to do it?  I'm considering
telling clients that I won't do it, although if a client told me they had
another lawyer draft a document and wanted me to check it, I would.  It's a
wonky area and sure to happen more.  Your thoughts?

Regards,
Scott
Winter Closure: Dec. 25 - Jan. 1
Scott Landsbaum, Inc.
323-314-7881 / f 323-714-2454
8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420, Beverly Hills, CA  90211
www.scottlandsbaum.com / www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/

NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals to
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute
it or any of the information it contains.  Please delete it immediately and
notify us by return e-mail or by telephone at (323) 314-7881.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any discussion of tax matters contained in
this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral or other written
communication is not intended to be used and cannot be used for the purpose
of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in connection with the promotion,
marketing or recommendation of any of the matters addressed in the
communication.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231211/abdeca7b/attachment.htm>