[E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?

O'Connell Jr., Robert robert.oconnell at orrick.com
Mon Nov 13 16:31:52 EST 2023


I think a polite status inquiry (citing TMEP 108.03 and 37 CFR 2.23(d) would be entirely reasonable at the six month point.


[cid:image004.png at 01DA164E.E6F6E010]
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.  Of Counsel [V-card] <https://www.orrick.com/api/sitecore/PersonnelPage/vCard?personnelGuid=D70E3581-E851-4059-998C-CB6F6087D51C>
Intellectual Property | Boston<https://www.google.com/maps/place/222+Berkeley+St+%232000,+Boston,+MA+02116/@42.3506611,-71.075501,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x89e37a74ad98b309:0xe4dba0ff17883d10!8m2!3d42.3506611!4d-71.0733123>
T: 1-617-880-1877
robert.oconnell at orrick.com<mailto:robert.oconnell at orrick.com>



From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Stephen McArthur via E-trademarks
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 4:24 PM
To: Carl Oppedahl <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Stephen McArthur <stephen at smcarthurlaw.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?

How long do you wait after filing a likelihood of confusion office action response to ping the Examiner about moving the application along? Is it unreasonable to do so if we filed an OAR 6 months ago?

The McArthur Law Firm
Stephen Charles McArthur
9465 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 300
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
(424) 258-6815
www.smcarthurlaw.com<http://www.smcarthurlaw.com>

This email, including any attachments, may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product, or inside information, for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient or if you received this message in error, please notify us and delete all copies. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality, including all privileges and copyrights that may apply. Thank you.

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com<http://www.orrick.com/>.

In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at https://www.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use this information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7df2ae37/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8057 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7df2ae37/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 856 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7df2ae37/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4790 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7df2ae37/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list