November 2023 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Nov 5 19:50:20 EST 2023
Ending: Thu Nov 30 21:26:13 EST 2023
Messages: 187

• [E-trademarks] test November 5   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] idiotic office actions   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] test November 5   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] test november 6   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] test november 6   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] mailing list   Michael Tobias
• [E-trademarks] How did they get my client's E-mail address?   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] mailing list   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] this listserv has been migrated to a new server   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] TESS Current VS TESS Beta: Cancellation Date Mismatches?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Question About Renewing WIPO Subsequent Designations   Nicole Syzdek
• [E-trademarks] idiotic office actions   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] idiotic office actions   Maria Eliseeva
• [E-trademarks] TESS Beta - Link To New Trademark Design Search Code Manual Still Fails   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] New TMEP Section   Diane Gardner
• [E-trademarks] TESS Beta - Link To New Trademark Design Search Code Manual Still Fails   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Diane Gardner
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Nineteenth anniversary of the TTABlog   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Notification of Notice of Publication   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Design Search Code Mysteries: 030116 030117 031912 030925 ??? TESS Beta & TSDR Feedback !!!   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] MyUSPTO activation links not being received   Jessica R Murray
• [E-trademarks] Registered marks and a pending application   Maria Eliseeva
• [E-trademarks] Jekyll + Hyde Office Action   Jaclyn Ionin
• [E-trademarks] Jekyll + Hyde Office Action   O'Connell Jr., Robert
• [E-trademarks] MyUSPTO activation links not being received   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] How I should configure "digest mode"?   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Montgomery, Alexander P.
• [E-trademarks] How I should configure "digest mode"?   voyer at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Mark Kaufman
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Edward Timberlake
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Greg William
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Montgomery, Alexander P.
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Nancy Dwyer Chapman
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Tushnet, Rebecca
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Richard Straussman
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   O'Connell Jr., Robert
• [E-trademarks] How I should configure "digest mode"?   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Can attorneys be guilty of trademark infringement for the manner they identify themselves?   Janice Housey
• [E-trademarks] Can attorneys be guilty of trademark infringement for the manner they identify themselves?   voyer at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Determining whether to protect a trademark for goods vs. services   Adam Sikich
• [E-trademarks] Can attorneys be guilty of trademark infringement for the manner they identify themselves?   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] TEAS voluntary amendment form problem   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] When the full search shows a mark on product that might or might not be shipped into the U.S.   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] When the full search shows a mark on product that might or might not be shipped into the U.S.   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] When the full search shows a mark on product that might or might not be shipped into the U.S.   Edward Timberlake
• [E-trademarks] Webinars on using the PTO's new searching platform, and responding to final office action rejections   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] Phishing scam using a misspelled version of my firm name/email address   Kathleen Brennan
• [E-trademarks] Webinars on using the PTO's new searching platform, and responding to final office action rejections   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] Questionable looking law firm listed as counsel of record   Michael D. Steger
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Questionable looking law firm listed as counsel of record   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] Referral - California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”)   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] TESS: Beta VS Current Live Mismatches For 13 November 2023   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Questionable looking law firm listed as counsel of record   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] Questionable looking law firm listed as counsel of record   asarabia2
• [E-trademarks] An Annoying TESS Beta Search: LD:true NOT (GS:* SN:89* SN:81*)   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] A new TM scam   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] When the full search shows a mark on product that might or might not be shipped into the U.S.   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?   Stephen McArthur
• [E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?   O'Connell Jr., Robert
• [E-trademarks] The Commercial Impression Of Æ (Dec 198) On TESS?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Nunc Pro Tunc and Renewals   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] Nunc Pro Tunc and Renewals   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] specimen sufficiency?   Jim Larsen
• [E-trademarks] specimen sufficiency?   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Nunc Pro Tunc and Renewals   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] How long is reasonable for an Examiner to take to respond to a 2(d) OAR?   Chris McHattie
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Nunc Pro Tunc and Renewals   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Maria Crimi Speth
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Joel G. MacMull
• [E-trademarks] Avoid Filing CAR Forms too rapidly   Steve Zemanick
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   mkrieger239 at earthlink.net
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Scott Sisun
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Ignacio, Vanessa A.
• [E-trademarks] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Chris McHattie
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Avoid Filing CAR Forms too rapidly   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Congratulations to John Welch for winning the 2023 INTA President's Award!   Edward Timberlake
• [E-trademarks] Madrid Extensions - Refusals Must be Made within 18 Months   Katherine Markert
• [E-trademarks] Madrid Extensions - Refusals Must be Made within 18 Months   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Yelp, FB, Instagram Takedown Issues   David Lizerbram
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   Greg William
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   Lindsey Corbin
• [E-trademarks] Beta search - live-dead grayed out   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Beta search - live-dead grayed out   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Beta search - live-dead grayed out   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   Doug Isenberg
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   David Michaels
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   Jaclyn Ionin
• [E-trademarks] Haloo.com TM Searching   Doug Isenberg
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   voyer at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] [Patentpractice] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Dov Rosenfeld
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Four Registration Errors On TESS Beta: 90645467 90645454 90389085 76303501   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Dineen Wasylik
• [E-trademarks] new to me phishing email/scam "I am writing to you on behalf of the legal department of USPTO Trademark US."   Tamera H Bennett
• [E-trademarks] appeal of TTAB case by new civil action   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
• [E-trademarks] anyone have a client that received correspondence from Trademark Troop?   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] anyone have a client that received correspondence from Trademark Troop?   Robert Rosenthal
• [E-trademarks] new to me phishing email/scam "I am writing to you on behalf of the legal department of USPTO Trademark US."   Richard Schafer
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Richard Schafer
• [E-trademarks] new to me phishing email/scam "I am writing to you on behalf of the legal department of USPTO Trademark US."   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] [Patentpractice] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] [Patentpractice] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Scott Nielson
• [E-trademarks] [Patentpractice] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] new to me phishing email/scam "I am writing to you on behalf of the legal department of USPTO Trademark US."   Rose Patents
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] [Patentpractice] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Daniel Feigelson
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments   Gerry J. Elman
• [E-trademarks] E-trademarks Digest, Vol 1, Issue 22   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Erin Geraghty
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Laurie Marshall
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Stacy Grossman
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Terry Carroll
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Laurie Marshall
• [E-trademarks] [EXTERNAL] Re: Wow Big Scam Alert..   Keller, Scott
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Jim Larsen
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Wow Big Scam Alert..   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Jim Larsen
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Richard Schafer
• [E-trademarks] XE.com money transfers (was Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments)   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] using XE.com to receive transfers (was Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments)   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] XE versus Wise (was Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments)   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Missing From TESS Beta: Occurrences & Dictionary Browse   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Good, Inexpensire service for bank wire payments   Paul Supnik
• [E-trademarks] XE versus Wise (was Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments)   Richard Schafer
• [E-trademarks] XE versus Wise (was Good, Inexpensive service for bank wire payments)   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] new to me phishing email/scam "I am writing to you on behalf of the legal department of USPTO Trademark US."   Art MacCord
• [E-trademarks] Another new refusal   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Another new refusal   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] Another new refusal   Patricia A. Walker
• [E-trademarks] Beta search - live-dead grayed out   Kelcey Patrick-Ferree
• [E-trademarks] German Counsel   Steve Zemanick
• [E-trademarks] Italy referral   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Italy referral   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Dividing out more than one class   Katherine Koenig
• [E-trademarks] Dividing out more than one class   Dale Quisenberry
• [E-trademarks] Fwd: USPTO retiring trademark videos   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] Dividing out more than one class   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Wresting Control and Ownership of Domain Name   Diane Gardner
• [E-trademarks] Wresting Control and Ownership of Domain Name   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Might want to hold off on using OKTA to sign in to the USPTO   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Case law re proving really really old use   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] TESS Retirement Party Begins At Noon!   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Case law re proving really really old use   voyer at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Renee.Kraft
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   carla calcagno
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Renee.Kraft
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] New Search System: Cannot Reliably Combine Search Results   Charles Luce
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   carla calcagno
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   carla calcagno
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Julia Anne Matheson
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Maria Crimi Speth
• [E-trademarks] Thoughts on Trademark Docketing Platforms   Rhett Barney
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] New Search System: Cannot Reliably Combine Search Results   Ron Kadden
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   Bourget, Anthony
• [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...   voyer at keganlaw.com

Last message date: Thu Nov 30 21:26:13 EST 2023
Archived on: Sat Mar 30 20:40:40 EDT 2024

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...