[E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim
Greg William
greg at danielsonlegal.com
Thu Nov 9 13:29:31 EST 2023
Another consideration - not all jurisdictions follow the rule that "no
color claim = all colors," and may only look at the drawing of the mark
submitted. This has also come up with me with word-only/standard character
marks.
Gregory S. William, Esq.*
Danielson Legal LLC
One Mifflin Place, Suite 400
Cambridge, MA 02138
w: www.danielsonlegal.com
e: greg at danielsonlegal.com
t: (617) 714-9579
direct: (508) 865-2204
f: (888) 742-8097
*Licensed to practice in Massachusetts
This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may
contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are
not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this
message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:24 PM Edward Timberlake via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> Who says it has to be one or the other?
>
> Why not both?
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ed Timberlake
> *Board Certified Specialist in Trademark Law
> <https://www.nclawspecialists.gov/for-the-public/find-a-board-certified-specialist/results/detail/?id=29473>*
>
> *Timberlake Law* <http://timberlakelaw.com/>
> Chapel Hill, NC
>
> Schedule a call on Clarity <https://clarity.fm/edtimberlake>
> ed at timberlakelaw.com
> 919.960.1950
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:18 PM Crane, Susan via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
>> One reason is if the mark is going to be used on exterior signage. It
>> gives the brand owner greater leverage against local zoning boards that
>> don’t want the colors used, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Susan L. Crane*
>>
>> *Group Vice President, Legal*
>>
>> *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>>
>>
>>
>> Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>>
>> 22 Sylvan Way
>>
>> Parsippany, NJ 07054
>>
>> *O* (973) 753-6455
>>
>> *M* (973) 879-3420
>>
>> Susan.Crane at wyndham.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
>> Behalf Of *Montgomery, Alexander P. via E-trademarks
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2023 12:56 PM
>> *To:* for trademark practitioners <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>> *Cc:* Montgomery, Alexander P. <amontgomery at hinckleyallen.com>
>> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] To Color Claim or Not To Color Claim
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve always wondered whether there is a compelling legal reason to make a
>> color claim in an application to register a logo. Is there any benefit
>> other than “your logo is a similar design and uses the same colors” (which
>> is
>>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>
>> *This Message Is From an External Sender *
>>
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
>> and know the content is safe.
>>
>> * Report Suspicious *
>> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!nMaPJNHrjwubpUWX8NlHFYmLo8oRbEZk0mIKvXWSVua76iFaZ0yg-E9C7DJiaovOog7fcZD47caqtOV10IQ3C9MXJDKWYH6IOW6y0fGu$>
>>
>>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>
>> I’ve always wondered whether there is a compelling legal reason to make a
>> color claim in an application to register a logo. Is there any benefit
>> other than “your logo is a similar design *and uses the same colors*”
>> (which is a valid argument even without a color claim)?
>>
>>
>>
>> The flexibility of a registration without a color claim seems to far
>> outweigh any benefits obtained by way of a registration with a color claim,
>> but I am prepared to be educated by the collective knowledge of this group.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Alexander P. Montgomery*
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.hinckleyallen.com/people/alexander-p-montgomery__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!lgZ9RkhL0r2lGJNlmHnZzQBlaL1zTM3PHvuFGFOmfEo4JiaqSA5rRI-0bzysNl__ZF6s6YD2U3Lop77fMv1sWsTgMR0Cbi8$>
>> *Partner*
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Hinckley Allen
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.hinckleyallen.com/__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!lgZ9RkhL0r2lGJNlmHnZzQBlaL1zTM3PHvuFGFOmfEo4JiaqSA5rRI-0bzysNl__ZF6s6YD2U3Lop77fMv1sWsTg8_xe5KQ$>
>> 28 State Street
>> Boston, MA 02109-1775
>> p: 617-378-4366 | f: 617-345-9020
>> amontgomery at hinckleyallen.com
>>
>>
>> This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the
>> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are
>> not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
>> destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in
>> the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to
>> operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to
>> form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
>> and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email
>> communications in the United States, including the content of emails and
>> attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance
>> and other purposes.
>> --
>> E-trademarks mailing list
>> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231109/3d7df14b/attachment.htm>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list