[E-trademarks] A Published For Opposition Curiosity
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Tue Apr 23 10:41:33 EDT 2024
Thank you Ken for posting.
Very interesting that there would be peaks and valleys for this.
A first guess I can make is that there might be odd interactions between
various parts of the Trademark Office. The people who do "final review
prior to publication" being on some production cycle (per month, let's
say) and the Examining Attorneys being on some other production cycle
(fiscal year calendar quarters, let's say) and this leading to
constructive and destructive interference.
A second guess I can make is that the IT and software platform people
might be doing randomly timed tweaks to the various underlying software
systems. And this could lead to periods of a week at a time when it is
harder than usual to carry out this process-flow step or that
process-flow step. Leading to boluses of cases getting held up at times
that cannot be easily predicted by outside observers. One bolus of
held-up cases might be, say, cases that are image-intensive. Another
bolus of held-up cases might be, say, cases that turn out to need
translations carried out.
On 4/23/2024 5:57 AM, Ken Boone via E-trademarks wrote:
> By chance, I did the search PO:20240423 this morning. Wow! 15,979
> trademarks published for opposition today*. Seemed like an unusually
> large count, prompting the following searches (comparing the first 17
> weeks of year 2023 to year 2024).
>
> Week
>
> 2023 Query
>
> Count
>
> 2024 Query
>
> Count
> 1
>
> PO:20230103
>
> 7,426
>
> PO:20240102
>
> 6,251
> 2
>
> PO:20230110
>
> 7,738
>
> PO:20240109
>
> 11,338
> 3
>
> PO:20230117
>
> 8,238
>
> PO:20240116
>
> 9,410
> 4
>
> PO:20230124
>
> 8,679
>
> PO:20240123
>
> 11,011
> 5
>
> PO:20230131
>
> 5,244
>
> PO:20240130
>
> 5,198
> 6
>
> PO:20230207
>
> 7,530
>
> PO:20240206
>
> 9,210
> 7
>
> PO:20230214
>
> 7,344
>
> PO:20240213
>
> 9,493
> 8
>
> PO:20230221
>
> 6,753
>
> PO:20240220
>
> 7,861
> 9
>
> PO:20230228
>
> 8,247
>
> PO:20240227
>
> 9,057
> 10
>
> PO:20230307
>
> 8,245
>
> PO:20240305
>
> 3,389
> 11
>
> PO:20230314
>
> 7,876
>
> PO:20240312
>
> 15,631
> 12
>
> PO:20230321
>
> 8,558
>
> PO:20240319
>
> 8,618
> 13
>
> PO:20230328
>
> 6,496
>
> PO:20240326
>
> 6,016
> 14
>
> PO:20230404
>
> 8,542
>
> PO:20240402
>
> 10,960
> 15
>
> PO:20230411
>
> 8,898
>
> PO:20240409
>
> 10,681
> 16
>
> PO:20230418
>
> 9,949
>
> PO:20240416
>
> 6,017
> 17
>
> PO:20230425
>
> 10,058
>
> PO:20240423
>
> 15,979
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Average
>
> 7,989
>
> Average
>
> 9,184
>
>
> Standard Dev
>
> 1187.4
>
> Standard Dev
>
> 3367.9
>
>
> Here's a quick plot.
>
>
> Publications for calendar year 2024 have been a bit more
> /chaotic/ than calendar year 2023. Why? I have no guesses.
>
> * The search PO:20240423 AND UD:20240423 only retrieves 35 records;
> that is, only 35 of the trademarks published for opposition today were
> updated this morning. Tomorrow's count may differ. Similarly,
> today's registrations ...
>
> Happy Trademarking,
> Ken Boone
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240423/0797ea5a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 27321 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240423/0797ea5a/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240423/0797ea5a/attachment.p7s>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list