[E-trademarks] how old the oldest applications are that have never seen an Examining Attorney?

[Charles B. Kramer]

At 06:17 PM 12/2/2024, Ken Boone wrote:
>Revisiting that search for applications currently over 2 years old ...
>.... AND AT:"Jackson George"  1,121

The Order to Show Cause also mentions Jeffrey Firestone  
In particular, Respondents have registered for, control, and/or operate one or more USPTO.gov accounts responsible for submitting documents that included (1) the electronic signature of attorney Jeffrey Firestone, including filings signed and submitted after his death, and/or (2) the signature of �Jackson George,� a presumed fictious [SIC] attorney. 
And someone on this list provided to me: https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2022/08/uspto-chinese-firms-used-dead-attorney-to-file-trademark-applications/  
Jeffrey Stewart Firestone is or was identified as an attorney of record in over 8,000 trademark applications and/or registrations. Despite news articles reporting Mr. Firestone�s death on July 30 or 31, 2021, more than 300 submissions, allegedly signed by Mr. Firestone, have been filed with the USPTO since August 2, 2021. 
 - Charles

>From: Charles B. Kramer <charlesbkramer.tm at gmail.com>
>Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 4:23 PM
>To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>Cc: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>; charles.b.kramer at gmail.com <charles.b.kramer at gmail.com>
>Subject: how old the oldest applications are that have never seen an Examining Attorney? 
> 
>FD:[* TO 20210930] AND (SA:" application assignment" ~5) NOT (SA:" application assignment" ~3)
>> retrieves 3,879 new applications filed prior to 1 October 2021 that have the new 
>> application awaiting assignment to an examining attorney status on TSDR, far 
>> more than the 75 applications that I mentioned on 8/23/2022.  That is, there are 
>> nearly 4,000 new applications filed prior to October 2021 that the USPTO appears 
>> to be ignoring
>
>Thanks, Ken!
>
>And (narrowing your fine search) many of them involve applicants from China, and the fictitious attorney "Jackson George" who was called out in the Show Cause Order of 2022 (and also the attorney of record in the pre-existing application about which I am complaining).
>
>The Show Cause order refers to "false, fictitious or fraudulent information in thousands of trademark application and registration records" which are listed on "EXHIBIT A" which I don't have.  I suspect that EXHIBIT A and your search results overlap.



===========================================
Charles B. Kramer, Esq.
~ ATTORNEY ~ 
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/charleskramer 
     Tel: +1 917-512-2721
   Email: charles.b.kramer at gmail.com <--- for direct responses (I don't always monitor CharlesBKramer.TM at gmail.com)
    Mail: 200 E. 10th Street, No. 816, New York, NY 10003 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/2e64dc29/attachment.html>