[E-trademarks] Trademark Center failures (was 2025 Trademark Fee Change Coincidence?)

[Lara Pearson]

AVOIDING it like the plague until they make me use it. Why prolong the
inevitable misery?

Brand Geek is closed for Reflection Week from noon on December 24, 2024
until January 6, 2025. This allows Andy, Lisa and Niya time to do the
things that they love with their friends & families. If you're experiencing
an IP emergency, please text me.


Lara Pearson (she/her/hers) [Why pronouns
<https://medium.com/gender-inclusivit/why-i-put-pronouns-on-my-email-signature-and-linkedin-profile-and-you-should-too-d3dc942c8743>
?] (Hear how I say my name <https://namedrop.io/larapearson>)

Law Office of Lara Pearson Ltd, PBC

Leader, Brand Geek

Lara at BrandGeek.net | Ph: 775.833.1600 | My bio <http://brandgeek.net/about/>


This e-mail may contain information that is *privileged* or *confidential*.
If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the
sender and delete/destroy all copies of this correspondence. Thank you.


*Brand Geek practices flex-time and a 4-day work week Mon-Thurs.** If you
see us working weekends, that's our choice. We do not expect anyone
(including you!) to work/respond on the weekend. Please respond at a time
that works for you. *

*Protecting the Brands that are Changing the World**®*

*Protecting the Businesses that are Changing the World*
*®Protecting the Brands of Soulfulpreneurs**®*


*Leading the way, we belong to **1% for the Planet (since January 2006),
SVN (since Spring 2007), **Certified B Corporation (since February 2008).*




*Save the planet! Please don't print.*

*I acknowledge my privilege to live, work and play on the unceded
traditional lands of the first people of Lake Tahoe, the Washoe or Wašišiw
("people from here," pronounced Wa She Shu). With humility and gratitude, I
honor this sacred land, and the Washoe Tribe <https://washoetribe.us/>. *




On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 4:37 AM Mark Kaufman via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> Is the collective wisdom to start “getting used to” the new system now, or
> wait to suffer and waste time after January 18 in the valiant hope that our
> thoughts will be heard from On High?
>
> Reminds of management of forced labor, rowing on the open seas:  “The
> flogging wil continue until morale improves.”
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> Mark S. Kaufman
>
> Kaufman & Kahn, LLP
>
> Email:  kaufman at kaufmankahn.com
>
> www.kaufmankahn.com
>
>
>
> 10 Grand Central
>
> 155 East 44th Street, 19th Floor
>
> New York, NY  10017
>
> Mobile:  (917) 453-7807
>
> Tel.:  (212) 293-5556, x 2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email is intended only for the party to whom it is addressed and may
> contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination or copying
> of this email is prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
> kindly notify us immediately, return the email to us, and destroy any
> electronic or other copies of the email (including any notification to us
> in your “Sent” folder). Thank you in advance for your cooperation and
> courtesy.
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2024, at 5:33 AM, Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> 
> On 12/17/2024 6:07 PM, Patti Giuliano via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> Having just used the new Beta application format for a few filings today,
> I think they should be paying us for this debacle of form.  I’ve been using
> it for a couple of months with little to no problems – even though the
> format is ridiculous and hard to review.  Today, two applications went
> through just fine.  The third one – not so much.  Twice it didn’t capture
> all the information (the information is on my “preview” copy but not on the
> emailed copy), I tried again, and the copy emailed to me was completely
> blank, and don’t get me started on the issues with the goods and services.
> Why does the USPTO like to change the order of the description?  You make a
> simple change, and it moves the phrase to the bottom of the list.  This
> just makes it harder to review.  If you need to make changes after you have
> emailed a draft to yourself, God be with you.  Warning:  there are things
> you cannot change after you have emailed a draft – like a matter number.
> Why?  Oh why?  What a nightmare.  Yes, I’m frustrated.
>
> I just went through (suffered through) a trademark filing in Trademark
> Center with a client.
>
> Over and over again I would fill in various fields (for example where the
> applicant is incorporated) and click through to later steps in the click
> path, and then send it to the client, and the version received by the
> client would be missing one or more of the fields.
>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241218/bc562233/attachment.htm>