[E-trademarks] TTAB - Question re brief opposing motion

[Carl Oppedahl]

A list member asks to post anonymously ...

We received a motion that does not contain citation to the applicable 
CFR section(s) that provide the basis for the motion.  Instead, the 
motion cites to the TBMP (and at that, they are not even the correct 
sections of the TBMP).  Is it worthwhile to point this defect out in a 
brief opposing the motion (amongst other reasons opposing the motion).  
If it is viewed as worthwhile, can the moving party simply rectify that 
deficiency if they file a reply brief?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240223/9ba51bc8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240223/9ba51bc8/attachment.p7s>