[E-trademarks] TTAB - Question re brief opposing motion

[Chris McHattie]

Footnote at most assuming motion is otherwise meritorious 

Feature if it substantive basis of motion being invalid

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 23, 2024, at 3:49 PM, Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> A list member asks to post anonymously ...
>  
> We received a motion that does not contain citation to the applicable CFR section(s) that provide the basis for the motion.  Instead, the motion cites to the TBMP (and at that, they are not even the correct sections of the TBMP).  Is it worthwhile to point this defect out in a brief opposing the motion (amongst other reasons opposing the motion).  If it is viewed as worthwhile, can the moving party simply rectify that deficiency if they file a reply brief?
> 
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240223/a49531d6/attachment.htm>