[E-trademarks] Petition To Revive Abandoned Application

[Laura Geyer]

Yes, extremely easy now! You used (like decades ago) almost to have to provide proof that your now-missing assistant was carried away in a flood, chased by fiery dragons, with irreplaceable relevant documents clenched in his hand or similar. No longer the case.

Laura

Laura Talley Geyer | Of Counsel

ND Galli Law LLC
1200 G Street, N.W., Ste 800
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 599-9019 (direct)
https://ndgallilaw.com/laura-geyer/
https://ndgallilaw.com/

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Sam Castree via E-trademarks
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 1:17 PM
To: Kevin Grierson <kgrierson at cm.law>; for trademark practitioners <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Sam Castree <sam at castreelaw.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Petition To Revive Abandoned Application

EXTERNAL EMAIL
Dear Kevin,

So, pretty easy, then?  That's great news.  Thanks!

Cheers,

Sam Castree, III

Sam Castree Law, LLC
3421 W. Elm St.
McHenry, IL 60050
(815) 344-6300

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:13 PM Kevin Grierson <kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>> wrote:
It’s like other petitions to revive, just a checkbox, except that you need to also file the extension request and pay the extension fee that would have been due to avoid abandonment.

Kevin Grierson​​​​
[cid:image001.png at 01DAD45F.861D26D0]
[Mobile:]
  757-726-7799<tel:757-726-7799>
[Fax:]
  866-521-5663
[Email:]
  kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of Sam Castree via E-trademarks
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 12:57 PM
To: for trademark practitioners <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Sam Castree <sam at castreelaw.com<mailto:sam at castreelaw.com>>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Petition To Revive Abandoned Application

EXTERNAL EMAIL
Dear List Mates,

How easy is it to revive a 1(b) application for failure to file a statement of use?  Is it pretty automatic, or is there something that needs to be shown beyond the statement that abandonment was inadvertent?  I don't think that I've never had to do this for someone before.

Cheers,

Sam Castree, III

Sam Castree Law, LLC
3421 W. Elm St.
McHenry, IL 60050
(815) 344-6300

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240712/55ec30e2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3100 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240712/55ec30e2/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 285 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240712/55ec30e2/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 452 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240712/55ec30e2/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 394 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240712/55ec30e2/attachment-0003.png>