[E-trademarks] Typosquatting remedies

doug at giga.law doug at giga.law
Tue Mar 5 19:43:45 EST 2024


The Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) does not apply to .com domain
names.  I discuss it in episode 12 of my masterclass on domain name
disputes: https://giga.law/masterclass

Doug


-----Original Message-----
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of
Terry Carroll via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 7:29 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Terry Carroll <carroll at tjc.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Typosquatting remedies

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Terry Carroll via E-trademarks wrote:

> What remedies are available, other than a full-blown UDRP, against a 
> typosquatter?

Thank you to Stacey, Doug and Daniel for their responses; all were very
helpful.

I additionally came across this description (https://www.icann.org/urs-en)
at ICANN of the Uniform Rapid Suspension process. "a rights protection
mechanism that complements the existing Uniform Domain-Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (UDRP) by offering a lower-cost, faster path to relief for
rights holders experiencing the most clear-cut cases of infringement."

I'd not previously come across this procedure, and wonder if anyone has
tried it. The fees are low ($375 at NAF,
https://www.adrforum.com/domain-dispute/urs ) and the rules call for a
decision within 2 business days.

Anyone ever gone that route?

--
Terry Carroll
carroll at tjc.com

--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com





More information about the E-trademarks mailing list