[E-trademarks] USPTO proposing fee increases
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Mon Mar 25 17:57:15 EDT 2024
On 3/25/2024 3:46 PM, Richard Schafer via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> The PTO justifies the large increases in post-reg fees by saying the
> percentage of registrations that get maintained is declining, so
> they’re jacking the fees on post-reg “to keep barriers to entry low
> for new applicants.” Which will, no doubt, result in even fewer
> registrations being maintained. At some point, I wonder if some
> registrants will simply stop maintaining registrations and apply for
> new ones because of the difference in costs.
>
I bet you are right that some registrants, particularly non-profits and
companies with limited funds, will make this choice. Which is really
unfortunate given that they will find themselves harmed by intervening
filings.
This stuff about “keeping barriers to entry low for new applicants”
strikes me as somewhat analogous to the patent side. On the patent side,
the USPTO justifies the very expensive maintenance fees with the idea
that if your invention has turned out to be valuable, they will charge
you the high maintenance fees so as to subsidize the initial filing fees.
But with patents, the high maintenance fees happen at most only three
times and then you are done. A gouge price for an 8-and-9 is a gift to
the USPTO that keeps on giving, perhaps in perpetuity, for any given
trademark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240325/79c8c188/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240325/79c8c188/attachment.p7s>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list