[E-trademarks] Is Only a Request to Suspend Proper to a Non-Final OA with Multiple Issues

[Dale Quisenberry]

Have you filed an extension yet?  If not I’d do that just to be safe.  Wait for it to be canceled and then respond.

Best regards,

Dale

C. Dale Quisenberry
Quisenberry Law PLLC
832.680.1000

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 28, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Orvis PC via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:


We received an office action with multiple 2(d) cites and goods/services rejections. One of the 2(d) citations is in its grace period and is about to be cancelled for failure to file Section 8/9. Is it proper to file a simple response requesting suspension in light of the imminent abandonment, where that response does not address the other 2(d) citations or the goods/services rejections?

TMEP 716.02(e) suggests not, but I swear I have done this before.
https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/current/TMEP-700d1e2495.html
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240328/6fac2d6f/attachment.htm>