[E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark
asarabia2
asarabia2 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 7 22:39:46 UTC 2025
Yes. Their leader was issued a get out of jail free card. Have to have
goodwill to get that.
On 2/7/2025 2:30 PM, Maria Crimi Speth via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> The Proud Boys have goodwill?
>
> Oh the irony.
>
> Jaburg Wilk <http://www.jaburgwilk.com/>
>
>
>
> *Maria Crimi Speth***********
>
> *Shareholder *
>
>
>
> * | ***
>
>
>
> Jaburg Wilk
>
>
>
> 602.248.1089 <tel:602.248.1089>
>
>
>
> |
>
>
>
>
>
> mcs at jaburgwilk.com <mailto:mcs at jaburgwilk.com>
>
> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2025 2:48 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark
>
> On 2/7/2025 2:31 PM, carla calcagno via E-trademarks wrote: Perhaps
> not as crazy as you think. On Jan 6 the Proud Boys attacked a well
> known historic black church in washington because it was displayi
>
> sophospsmartbannerend
>
> On 2/7/2025 2:31 PM, carla calcagno via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> Perhaps not as crazy as you think. On Jan 6 the Proud Boys
> attacked a well known historic black church in washington because
> it was displaying a Black Lives Matter sign. The church sued and
> asked for damages . Proud boys defaulted . Church then sued to
> enforce the judgment and sought transfer and or lien on the name
> as an asset of group. Judge awarded it - are you suggesting judge
> cannot award IP to satisfy a tort judgement ? Assuming church
> makes use of the mark in an appropriate period , why not?
> Personally I’m thrilled .
>
> My thrilled reaction matches yours. But wouldn't it have been helpful
> if the judge's order were to have explicitly conveyed not only the
> registration but also the associated goodwill?
>
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2025, at 12:36 PM, Julia Anne Matheson via
> E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> It’s absurd. I’m seeing it too. Makes no sense at all.
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf Of
> *Miriam Richter, Esq. via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2025 12:29 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons
> to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Miriam Richter, Esq. <mrichter at richtertrademarks.com>
> <mailto:mrichter at richtertrademarks.com>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark
>
> *WARNING:* External email, do not click on links or open
> attachments unless you recognize the sender’s full email
> address and expect the attachments.
>
> All,
>
> I’ve had a crazy week so it is possible that I’m missing
> something really basic here because my brain is fried, but,
> how is an historic Black church in DC going to own the
> trademark? How will they show use? I found four pending
> applications and no registrations. All four are owned by
> different individuals/companies and all but one are 1b.
>
> How can the trademark PROUD BOYS indicate a Black church as
> the source of the goods/services being provided? Is this a
> common law trademark thing?
>
> Does anyone have access to the opinion?
>
> Best,
>
> Miriam
>
> Miriam Richter, Attorney at Law, P.L.
>
> /Make Your Mark! ®/
>
> Trademark, Copyright, and other Intellectual Property Matters
> 2312 Wilton Drive, Suite 9
> Wilton Manors, Florida 33305
>
> 954-977-4711 office
>
> 954-240-8819 cell
> 954-977-4717 facsimile
> *
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail
> message contains _confidential information_ that may be
> _legally privileged_. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy,
> use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-240-8819
> and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail
> message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior
> message, some or all of the contents of this message or
> anyattachments may not have been produced by the sender.*
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> <https://us-east-2.protection.sophos.com?d=oppedahl-lists.com&u=aHR0cDovL29wcGVkYWhsLWxpc3RzLmNvbS9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2UtdHJhZGVtYXJrc19vcHBlZGFobC1saXN0cy5jb20=&i=NWZjN2IzODdkNTFiOTUwZGY5Zjc2ZThl&t=WDJZQWlMZWVleXQrUFl5OWdyQzZZbU52UHk0VDcxeHRYY2JDQ2tNQ1RJVT0=&h=fdc93b27e61e401e9f3e3ed8705ec235&s=AVNPUEhUT0NFTkNSWVBUSVaTTxKQ49wv4eSgzjbXRsG3NSCRu3Vh0ZXA6WVIHZ009RUFnH9mAa-JBMM2M0B4Cj0>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250207/6fd4965c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4780 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250207/6fd4965c/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 547 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250207/6fd4965c/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 502 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250207/6fd4965c/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list