[E-trademarks] Fwd: [#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]
Pamela Chestek
pamela at chesteklegal.com
Wed Jul 23 16:00:20 UTC 2025
Hello all,
I'm assuming that the sender here is up to no good. There is an attorney
listed for the application, although the primary email address for the
application is not functional. There is a second email address for
correspondence that is a Hotmail address that I assume is working. The
name of the attorney is too common to be able to find using the AT field
in the application to see whether he commonly files trademark
applications, although a Google search found one TTAB proceeding that
used the same bad email address and a different Hotmail address as the
second correspondence address. There is a "Coming Soon" page at the
domain used for the invalid email address. The address in the
application is a private residence, although that's not all that
unusual. The property records for the address show that it is owned by
the person with the same name as the attorney listed in the application.
There is a lawyer with the name admitted in Texas with a practice
address in the state of the address in the application -- different
actual address, but we've all been there.
So do I write to the lawyer listed in the application and let them know
that I received this?
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW MAILING ADDRESS
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal
www.chesteklegal.com
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for
Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:50:29 +0000
From: us at abctrademark.com
To: pamela at chesteklegal.com
Dear colleague.
Hope this email can meet you well.
This is a consultation about the scope of goods restricted by US trademarks
1. Our client has a trademark application [redacted] in US.
We understand that you are not the agent for this trademark application
at present, but we may want to entrust you to operate this restricted
service. Therefore, before the operation, we would like to communicate
with you about the details:
(1) This trademark belongs to Class 35. As Class 35 is a service class,
the client currently wants to limit these services to pet services.
Regarding the trademark applications that have already been submitted,
is this possible in US?
(2) If possible, in what form are restrictions imposed? Add a sentence
after the service? For example, 'all the aforementioned services related
to products for pets', or in what form?
(3) Or is it not allowed to do so in the United States for a trademark
application that has already been filed?
2. What are the related costs? (Official fees+service fees)
3. Do you need any files?
Looking forward to your early reply.
Best wishes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250723/b2d60e0a/attachment.html>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list