[E-trademarks] [External Sender] Fwd: [#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]

Wed Jul 23 19:01:52 UTC 2025

I also received it!

Best,
Miriam

Miriam Richter, Attorney at Law, P.L.
Make Your Mark! ®
Trademark, Copyright, and other Intellectual Property Matters
2312 Wilton Drive, Suite 9
Wilton Manors, Florida 33305

954-240-8819 cell
954-977-4717 facsimile

NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-240-8819 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or anyattachments may not have been produced by the sender.

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Ronni Jillions via E-trademarks
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 11:03 AM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Ronni Jillions <Ronni.Jillions at FisherBroyles.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] [External Sender] Fwd: [#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]

We got it too. maybe report to PTO too?

Ronni S. Jillions

Partner

____________________________________________

FisherBroyles, LLP

direct: +1.202.628.5217

cell: +1.703.856.2226

ronni.jillions at fisherbroyles.com<mailto:ronni.jillions at fisherbroyles.com>

www.fisherbroyles.com<http://www.fisherbroyles.com/>

The information contained in this e-mail message is only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

We will never use email to notify you of a change to any bank account details we have already provided to you. If you receive any email purporting to come from this firm which seeks to do this, then please contact us immediately by telephone and do not act on it or reply to it.  We cannot accept responsibility for any loss if you do not follow these instructions.

________________________________
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> on behalf of Pamela Chestek via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 12:00:20 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com<mailto:pamela at chesteklegal.com>>
Subject: [External Sender][E-trademarks] Fwd: [#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]

Hello all,

I'm assuming that the sender here is up to no good. There is an attorney listed for the application, although the primary email address for the application is not functional. There is a second email address for correspondence that is a Hotmail address that I assume is working. The name of the attorney is too common to be able to find using the AT field in the application to see whether he commonly files trademark applications, although a Google search found one TTAB proceeding that used the same bad email address and a different Hotmail address as the second correspondence address. There is a "Coming Soon" page at the domain used for the invalid email address. The address in the application is a private residence, although that's not all that unusual. The property records for the address show that it is owned by the person with the same name as the attorney listed in the application. There is a lawyer with the name admitted in Texas with a practice address in the state of the address in the application -- different actual address, but we've all been there.

So do I write to the lawyer listed in the application and let them know that I received this?

Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW MAILING ADDRESS
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal
www.chesteklegal.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.chesteklegal.com&d=DwMDaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=MFQ6XTl05NBO44xNvMfp_eKycF16c9aSLtJVvpVV6tGg1KxH8M1AVqBEnFUhTH2T&m=wsSx7fWeqNpm7cRsilgEaPIOs3Eos7bXcMeCek_p2toYFzV7vO0PIupCitOpoUHa&s=KOdXjJxyUU7VyFFBuBdtOSw-u3etu-ql6hQcGfssy9k&e=>

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:
[#175327094737] Inquiry on Adding Product Restrictions for Trademark Application (Class 35 Services) [redacted]
Date:
Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:50:29 +0000
From:
us at abctrademark.com<mailto:us at abctrademark.com>
To:
pamela at chesteklegal.com<mailto:pamela at chesteklegal.com>

Dear colleague.
Hope this email can meet you well.

This is a consultation about the scope of goods restricted by US trademarks

1. Our client has a trademark application [redacted] in US.

We understand that you are not the agent for this trademark application at present, but we may want to entrust you to operate this restricted service. Therefore, before the operation, we would like to communicate with you about the details:

(1) This trademark belongs to Class 35. As Class 35 is a service class, the client currently wants to limit these services to pet services. Regarding the trademark applications that have already been submitted, is this possible in US?

(2) If possible, in what form are restrictions imposed? Add a sentence after the service? For example, 'all the aforementioned services related to products for pets', or in what form?

(3) Or is it not allowed to do so in the United States for a trademark application that has already been filed?

2. What are the related costs? (Official fees+service fees)

3. Do you need any files?

Looking forward to your early reply.
Best wishes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250723/64664bb0/attachment.html>