[E-trademarks] Latest Domicile Address Fun

[Greg William]

(Apologies in advance to any equine aficionados, but I'm gonna beat the
dead horse.).

I don't believe this specific point has been discussed here, but after
speaking with someone at the USPTO I wanted to bring it to everyone's
attention.  If the street address listed as domicile in an application is
flagged by the USPTO's address verification software/service as being
associated with, *e.g.*, a mail delivery address, it doesn't matter if a
floor/suite number is also included when the application is filed.
Basically, if *any* occupant of a commercial building is a coworking space
or mail service (and the USPTO's verification system knows that), it
creates a rebuttable presumption that the address is impermissible for use
as a domicile by *any other* occupants..

Discuss.

-Greg

Gregory S. William, Esq.*
Danielson Legal LLC
One Mifflin Place, Suite 400
Cambridge, MA 02138
w: www.danielsonlegal.com
e: greg at danielsonlegal.com
t: (617) 714-9579
direct: (508) 865-2204
f: (888) 742-8097

*Licensed to practice in Massachusetts

This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may
contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are
not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this
message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250605/fc0e5eb5/attachment.html>