[E-trademarks] Arguing Weak Mark is an Attack on Registration?

Scott Landsbaum scott at scottlandsbaum.com
Thu Jun 12 19:23:25 UTC 2025


Howdy All,
I'm dealing with a brand new (< 1 year) examining attorney on a 2(d)
refusal.  I argued that the blocking registration is very weak because of a
substantial number of identical commercial uses of the registered mark by
unrelated manufacturers and therefore the minor difference between our
application and the blocking registration should be sufficient to avoid
confusion.  The examining attorney rejected the argument as a "collateral
attack on the registration" that would "negate the presumption of the
registrant’s exclusive right to use the mark in commerce on or in
connection with the services listed in the registration."  She never
addressed the question of whether it is a weak mark with a limited scope of
protection.

Am I crazy in thinking this is a total non-sequitur?
If not, would you reach out to the examiner or the manager?

She made this a final action so it's a real pain now.

Regards,
Scott

Scott Landsbaum, Inc.
323-314-7881 / f 323-714-2454
8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420, Beverly Hills, CA  90211
www.scottlandsbaum.com / www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/

NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals to
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute
it or any of the information it contains.  Please delete it immediately and
notify us by return email or by telephone at (323) 314-7881.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any discussion of tax matters contained in
this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral or other written
communication is not intended to be used and cannot be used for the purpose
of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in connection with the promotion,
marketing or recommendation of any of the matters addressed in the
communication.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250612/708da9db/attachment.html>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list