[E-trademarks] Registration Certificates for Madrid marks

[Carl Oppedahl]

I did a search "SN:79* AND RD:[2025-09-07 TO 2025-09-28]" and the first 
four hits all lacked the "owner of international registration" text.  I 
stopped clicking after seeing it four times in a row.    I imagine a 
curious person with more energy than me could tinker with that search 
and maybe work out when the USPTO mistake started.

I suppose one thing to investigate is whether the presence of "owner of 
international registration" text is actually required by law or rule or 
TMEP.  If it is not actually required, then I guess this may be simply a 
cost-cutting measure.

Years ago when the USPTO began publishing patent applications, the pub 
would list the firm name on the front page.  Then I guess some 
beancounter noticed that the law did not require this info to be there.  
And the USPTO stopped providing that information.  It could be a similar 
thing here maybe.

  * https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=79340365&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch
  * https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=79352768&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch
  * https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=79360847&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch
  * https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=79363075&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch

On 9/28/2025 7:46 AM, Katherine Koenig via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> Do Registration Certificates for Madrid marks no longer show the 
> International Registration information?  I just received the second or 
> third in which there’s no mention of an International Registration, 
> whereas this is what they used to show something like this:
>
> OWNER OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION 1794266 DATED 05-06-2024,
>
> EXPIRES 05-06-2034
>
> I called TAC about 3-4 weeks ago to ask for a reprint of the first one 
> I encountered, and was assured it was a USPTO mistake that would be 
> corrected, but it hasn’t yet been fixed and I’ve since received a few 
> more like it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Katherine
>
> Dr. Katherine Koenig
>
> /Registered Patent Attorney/
>
> Koenig IP Works, PLLC
>
> 2208 Mariner Dr.
>
> Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
>
> (954) 903-1699
>
> katherine at koenigipworks.com <mailto:katherine at koenigipworks.com>
>
> /Targeted Intellectual Property Strategy/
>
> /The information contained in this communication, including any 
> attachments, is privileged and confidential information intended only 
> for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If //you are not 
> the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to 
> deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication 
> is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in 
> error, do not read it.  Please immediately reply to the sender that 
> you have received this communication in error and then destroy all 
> paper and electronic copies.  Thank you./
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250928/1fc219cd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7679 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250928/1fc219cd/attachment.png>