[Patentcenter] ADS Domestic Benefit Claims Re-Ordered Out of Order
John Smith
johnsmithemail1982 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 31 12:16:12 EST 2024
Thank you for the heads-up!
IIRC, this same thing happened for several months about five or so years
ago in the Web-ADS in EFS-Web. You entered the benefit claim correctly,
but it was reordered in the resulting PDF file, which the USPTO then
transferred to the filing receipt!
I wonder if there is a connection?
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:05 PM Orvis PC via Patentcenter <
patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> In case this happens to others, the fix (or non-intuitive workflow) seems
> to be:
>
>
> 1. Delete all benefit claims.
> 2. Add benefit claims back in the right order.
> 3. If PC changes the order:
> - Delete the out-of-order benefit claims.
> - Add, in the right order, a single benefit claim.
> - Save the submission/progress
> - Go to the workbench and select the saved submission
> - Add the next benefit claim in the right order.
> - Repeat until all benefit claims are listed in the right order.
>
> Then, take a mental health break before explaining to the client why the
> bill is larger than expected.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:11 PM Orvis PC <orvispc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Below is an annotated screenshot. PC moved the 2022 filing to end instead
>> of the 2021 filing.
>> [image: image.png]
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:52 PM Orvis PC <orvispc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am having issues with PC re-ordering domestic benefit claims. I am in
>>> PC right now prepping a corrected ADS. The domestic benefit claims have
>>> been entered in the chronological order from the most recent to the oldest.
>>> But, the preview PDF shows they have been re-ordered. Specifically, the
>>> oldest filing (a provisional, by about a year) is re-ordered to not be
>>> last.
>>>
>>> This same problem has occurred in new filings, resulting in an OFR
>>> listing the benefit claims not in chronological order. I did not see this
>>> issue on https://patentcenter-tickets.oppedahl.com/.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>> --
> Patentcenter mailing list
> Patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240131/8c6b6f0e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 220255 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240131/8c6b6f0e/attachment.png>
More information about the Patentcenter
mailing list