[Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?

[Suzannah K. Sundby]

BlaahahaHAAHAHAHahaha…

Thanks for the big belly laugh this fine Friday :)

Suzannah K. Sundby<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/> | Partner
canady + lortz LLP<http://www.canadylortz.com/>
1050 30th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
T: 202.486.8020
F: 202.540.8020
suzannah at canadylortz.com<mailto:suzannah at canadylortz.com>
www.canadylortz.com<http://www.canadylortz.com/>
Confidentiality Notice:  This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you may not read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message or any part.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.

From: Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 11:28 AM
To: For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com>
Subject: Re: [Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?


This reminds me of the time the Ohio legislature considered a bill that would define pi to be equal to 3.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill .
On 8/29/2024 9:15 AM, Tim Ackermann via Patentpractice wrote:
Jeffrey, that's purely administrative, so no Federal Register posting is necessary.
Tim Ackermann
The Ackermann Law Firm

E:  tim at ackermannlaw.com<mailto:tim at ackermannlaw.com>
P:  817.305.0690
F:  214.453.0810
W: ackermannlaw.com<http://ackermannlaw.com>
O: 1701 W. Northwest Hwy. Ste. 100
     Grapevine TX 76051


On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:11 AM Jeffrey Semprebon via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
Did I miss the Federal Register announcement where the USPTO redefined sizes to state that 74MB exceeds 100MB?

[cid:image001.png at 01DAFAC8.1DEC0060]



-Jeff

Jeffrey E. Semprebon
Registered Patent Agent (mechanical) looking for remote work
jesemprebon at gmail.com<mailto:jesemprebon at gmail.com>
72 Myrtle Street
Claremont, New Hampshire 03743
--
Patentpractice mailing list
Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240830/fee96d90/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25470 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240830/fee96d90/attachment.png>