August 2024 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Aug 1 00:00:55 UTC 2024
Ending: Fri Aug 30 14:33:57 UTC 2024
Messages: 185

• [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Randall Svihla
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Randall Svihla
    • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Sarah Adriano
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Orvis
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Jeffrey Semprebon
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   Rick Neifeld
  • [Patentpractice] National phase under 371 -- what's required?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] PPH: What Amendments are Permitted?   Scott Nielson
  • [Patentpractice] PPH: What Amendments are Permitted?   Jim Larsen
    • [Patentpractice] PPH: What Amendments are Permitted?   Scott Nielson
      • [Patentpractice] PPH: What Amendments are Permitted?   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] PPH: What Amendments are Permitted?   Jeffrey Semprebon
• [Patentpractice] Ethics CLE – securing electronic communications   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] USPTO filing of response to Pre-Exam formalities   Robert S. Smith
• [Patentpractice] another bug in patentcrapper? missing link in ass. center?   Dan Feigelson
  • [Patentpractice] can't find the link to the list of PC tickets   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] another bug in patentcrapper? missing link in ass. center?   Andrea R. Jacobson
• [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Krista Jacobsen
  • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   David Thibodeau
    • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Randall Svihla
  • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Alan Taboada
    • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Goldberg, Judi
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
      • [Patentpractice] O/US being slow (was RE: group letter)   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] O/US being slow (was RE: group letter)   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] RO/US being slow - national security review   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
      • [Patentpractice] RO/US being slow - national security review   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] RO/US being slow - national security review   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] RO/US being slow - national security review   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] RO/US being slow - national security review   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Andrea R. Jacobson
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Alan Taboada
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] venting - failure to download priority document from DAS   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Ethics and EDI CLE courses are now accredited   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Krista Jacobsen
  • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Randall Svihla
    • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
  • [Patentpractice] Reply period for lack-of-unity finding in US 371 application   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Foreign Priority Application Missing Drawings   Scott Nielson
  • [Patentpractice] Foreign Priority Application Missing Drawings   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] EDI CLE webinar and ethics CLE webinar   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] "track 1 off" for a non-track 1 case   Dan Feigelson
  • [Patentpractice] "track 1 off" for a non-track 1 case   Randall Svihla
    • [Patentpractice] "track 1 off" for a non-track 1 case   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] "track 1 off" for a non-track 1 case   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Payment not verified   WARREN SMITH
  • [Patentpractice] Payment not verified   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Jeff Wendt
    • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Wendt Firm
  • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Doreen Trujillo
    • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] Success of challenging finality of Office Action   Benjamin Keim
• [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Krista Jacobsen
  • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Timothy Snowden
    • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Krista Jacobsen
  • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Randall Svihla
    • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Krista Jacobsen
  • [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Who would like to do some PHP or Python coding?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   Sharon Rubin
  • [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   Robert Blaha
    • [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
    • [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   Jeffrey Semprebon
      • [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Any word on when the USPTO will stop sending a presentation copy of issued patents?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Potential chaos in India patent or trademark prosecution   Richard Schafer
• [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Richard Straussman
  • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Patent Lawyer
    • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Patent Lawyer
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Irving Fishman
  • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Daniel Ratoff
  • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Richard Straussman
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Richard Straussman
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Masson, Roger M.
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Irving Fishman
    • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Rohan Wallace at Rohan Wallace
  • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Scott Nielson
    • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Valensa, Jeroen
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Foreign Filing License Incongruity Question   Valensa, Jeroen
• [Patentpractice] May 21 Senate judiciary committee hearing on affordable medications and competition in the pharmaceutical drug market   Leigh T
• [Patentpractice] voluntary filing RCE before Final OA to pay Track 1 /prioritized examination fees   Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com)
  • [Patentpractice] voluntary filing RCE before Final OA to pay Track 1 /prioritized examination fees   Jim Larsen
    • [Patentpractice] voluntary filing RCE before Final OA to pay Track 1 /prioritized examination fees   Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com)
• [Patentpractice] potential fee increase for fiscal year 2025   William Ahmed
  • [Patentpractice] potential fee increase for fiscal year 2025   Rebecca Westers
    • [Patentpractice] potential fee increase for fiscal year 2025   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] payment outage over the weekend   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   welched123 at gmail.com
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Dislodging office actions counted but not mailed for weeks   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
      • [Patentpractice] Dislodging office actions counted but not mailed for weeks   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Dislodging office actions counted but not mailed for weeks   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Dislodging office actions counted but not mailed for weeks   John Hammond
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Dale Quisenberry
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Scott Nielson
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Rick Neifeld
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Sarah Adriano
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Katherine Koenig
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   david at hricik.com
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Suzannah K. Sundby
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Rick Neifeld
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT   Jamie Sheridan
• [Patentpractice] do fees increase Oct 1, 2024 OR Jan 1, 2025???   William Ahmed
  • [Patentpractice] do fees increase Oct 1, 2024 OR Jan 1, 2025???   David Boundy
    • [Patentpractice] do fees increase Oct 1, 2024 OR Jan 1, 2025???   Leigh T
  • [Patentpractice] do fees increase Oct 1, 2024 OR Jan 1, 2025???   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Ethics CLE today! EDI CLE next week   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: Tomorrow: Loper Bright Impact on USPTO Decisions & Regulation CLE, @1:00 P.M. E.D.T.   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Restriction based on dependent claim?   john at ogilvielawfirm.com
  • [Patentpractice] Restriction based on dependent claim?   Jeffrey Semprebon
    • [Patentpractice] Restriction based on dependent claim?   Dale Quisenberry
• [Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?   Jeffrey Semprebon
  • [Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?   Tim Ackermann
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO math - 74 > 100?   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Patenting Strategy for China   Patent Lawyer
  • [Patentpractice] Patenting Strategy for China   Timothy Snowden
    • [Patentpractice] Patenting Strategy for China   Valensa, Jeroen
      • [Patentpractice] Engagement Letters   Roger Browdy
  • [Patentpractice] Patenting Strategy for China   Richard Straussman
  • [Patentpractice] Patenting Strategy for China   Brian

Last message date: Fri Aug 30 14:33:57 UTC 2024
Archived on: Mon Dec 29 19:46:26 UTC 2025

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...