[Patentpractice] filing by reference - avoids the non-docx charge or not?
David Boundy
PatentProcedure at gmail.com
Thu Dec 5 15:30:25 UTC 2024
And if you file by reference, you trigger another fee. I don't recall the
relative magnitude relative to the DOCX fee.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:27 AM Scott Nielson via Patentpractice <
patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> I don't know whether filing by reference avoids the docx fee. However, if
> you do file by reference, be sure to also file a miscellaneous letter
> explaining that you are filing by reference (explicitly call out the
> relevant section of the ADS where you file by reference and cite the
> applicable rules and MPEP section that discuss filing by reference) or the
> USPTO clerk who picks it up might mistakenly issue a notice of
> nonprovisional filing-no filing date assigned.
>
> I've filed four cases by reference with only an ADS and had two processed
> correctly and two mistakenly receive a notice of nonprovisional filing-no
> filing date assigned (not fun).
>
> Scott Nielson
> 801-660-4400
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on
> behalf of Bob Barber via Patentpractice <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
> >
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2024 6:26:05 AM
> *To:* For Patent Practitioners. This Is Not for Laypersons To Seek Legal
> Advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Bob Barber <bobbarber1970 at yahoo.com>
> *Subject:* [Patentpractice] filing by reference - avoids the non-docx
> charge or not?
>
> I'm sure this was discussed previously but I don't recall the answer: does
> filing by reference avoid the non-docx charge? I assume not, but thought
> I'd ask. I have to file a continuation in a case in which I don't have a
> docx version of the spec but only a pdf version.
>
> An alternative is to use pdf-xchange to convert the document to docx, and
> to include the backup pdf upon filing. Since the parent case is
> incorporated by reference, I can then just file a replacement spec later,
> viz. the original pdf (rather than proofread the "docx" version, which
> isn't worth my time or the client's money).
>
> Bob
>
> --
> Patentpractice mailing list
> Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
>
--
* [image: Cambridge Technology Law LLC]
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>*
Listed as one of the world's 300 leading intellectual property strategists
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>
Articles at http://ssrn.com/author=2936470 <http://ssrn.com/author=2936470>
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>
Click here to add me to your contacts.
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>
* David Boundy
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>*
DBoundy at cambridgetechlaw.com <dboundy at cambridgetechlaw.com> / +1
646.472.9737 <%2B1%206464729737>
Cambridge Technology Law LLC
686 Massachusetts Avenue #201, Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.CambridgeTechLaw.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/DavidBoundy
mailing address
PO Box 590638
Newton MA 02459
This communication is a confidential attorney-client communication intended
only for the person named above or an authorized representative. Any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited, whether by the author or recipients. Any legal, business or
tax information contained in this communication, including attachments and
enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific
issues, nor a substitute for a formal opinion, nor is it sufficient to
avoid legal or other adverse consequences to the recipient. Unless you are
the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not
copy, use, disclose or distribute this communication or attribute to the
Firm any information contained in this communication. If you have received
this communication in error, please advise the sender by replying to this
message or by telephone, and then promptly delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241205/392bcb9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list