[Patentpractice] status identifier "withdrawn"?
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Fri Dec 6 22:02:00 UTC 2024
When exactly am I required to use the status identifier "withdrawn"?
I was taught, years ago, that it was up to me when if ever I would use
that status identifier.
Suppose there was a restriction between three independent claims 1, 2,
and 3 and suppose I elect claim 2.
What I was taught was, I was not required to use a status identifier of
"withdrawn" for claim 1 until I was good and ready.
Eventually maybe the time would come that claim 2 gets allowed, and
maybe the client would be prepared to suck it up and get a patent with
only claim 2. If so, then I would cancel claim 1 and next thing you
know I would get a notice of allowance.
Just now I have the following sequence of events (claim numbers changed
to protect the innocent).
* Independent claims 1, 2, 3 filed.
* Examiner calls on the phone, restricts saying there are three
inventions.
* On the phone I elect claim 2.
* Examiner mails an Office Action, memorializing the election and
rejecting claim 2.
* I file a response to the Office Action. Claims 1 and 3 have status
identifier "original". Claim 2 has status identifier "presently
amended".
* Examiner mails a notice of non-compliant amendment, saying that I
should have used status identifier "withdrawn" for claims 1 and 3.
Question. Is this the Examiner busting my chops with a made-up rule?
Or is it really true that my hands are tied and I had no choice but to
give a status of "withdrawn" for claims 1 and 3?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241206/aa52c289/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241206/aa52c289/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list