[Patentpractice] getting certified copy to the USPTO (was paper certified copy [foreign priority] not showing up image file wrapper (patent center) for 111 bypass [CIP of PCT])
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Thu Dec 19 19:02:14 UTC 2024
Colleagues, your suffering inspired a blog article:
https://blog.oppedahl.com/uspto-mail-room-works-unacceptably-slowly/
I am sorry for your suffering, but maybe the blog article will nudge
somebody at the USPTO to take corrective action.
On 12/16/2024 7:24 AM, Andrea R. Jacobson via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> In our experience, it is common for it to take several weeks for a
> paper priority document to be placed into the transaction history of a
> US application. We mailed one in September 5, it as stamped received
> September 9, and it was in the file wrapper significantly in November
> – but with the September 9 date.
>
> If you are able to file the SB38 to retrieve an electronic copy of it,
> that usually works in a matter of days.
>
> *From:*Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 15, 2024 9:48 AM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>; for Users of the
> Patent Cooperation Treaty <pct at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com>
> *Subject:* [Patentpractice] getting certified copy to the USPTO (was
> paper certified copy [foreign priority] not showing up image file
> wrapper (patent center) for 111 bypass [CIP of PCT])
>
> Was the US national phase entered from this PCT? If yes, then what
> should have happened is your Examiner ought to have gone and found the
> priority document in the parent case.
>
> Is Country X a Depositing Office in DAS for this kind of priority
> document? If yes, then the path is clear. Run, don't walk, to
> Country X and do what it takes to get the patent office there to make
> the application available to DAS. This includes obtaining the DAS
> access code. Then use the DAS system to set up "tracking" for the
> application and download a Certificate of Availability from DAS. Then
> fill out Form PTO-SB38 (
> https://blog.oppedahl.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PTO-SB-38.pdf )
> and e-file it in your allowed case. Then follow up with an email to
> pdx at uspto.gov to get the USPTO to retrieve the electronic certified
> copy. Bob's your uncle.
>
> On 12/15/2024 4:17 AM, William Ahmed via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> FACT-PATTERN (background)
>
> (1a) One of our cases recently got allowed -- this was a 111
> bypass [CIP] of a PCT.
>
> (2a) The PCT claimed priority to a non-US priority application
> [let's call this non-USA country "Country X"]
>
> (3a) For some reason, the PCT-filing attorney never obtained a
> PDAS code - they simply filed the PCT in the receiving office of
> "Country X," and Country X's receiving office provided it to WIPO.
>
> (4a) An interim copy was electronically submitted via EFS-web
> within 4 months of CIP filing.
>
> (5a( I confess that we were NOT diligent about submitting the
> paper certified copy and waited until allowance.
>
> FACT-PATTERN (CURRENT STATUS )
>
> (1b) We still have plenty of time until the issue-fee deadline -
> about two months [Rule 55 requires that "a certified copy of the
> foreign application must still be filed during the pendency of the
> application"]
>
> (2b) Our plan (is)(was) to Fedex a paper certified copy to the
> USPTO before paying the issue-fee.
>
> (3b) we actually FEDEXED the certified copy to the address in the
> APPENDIX below.
>
> (4b) the USPTO signed for it about two weeks ago. We have "proof
> of delivery" [they signed for at 9 PM on a particular day]
>
> (5b) two weeks later, we cannot see the paper certified copy in
> the file wrapper.
>
> Even though we have time to 'correct' and to re-send, we would
> like to figure out what happened.
>
> MY QUESTION --> Does anyone have experience with this? Please advise.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> APPENDIX
>
> We obtained a paper certify copy and FedExed it to:
>
> United States Patent and Trademark Office
>
> Customer Service Window, Mail Stop Amendment
>
> Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street
>
> 22314 ALEXANDRIA Virginia
>
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
>
> They SIGNED signed for it and we have the Fedex "proof of
> delivery" (which is probably worthless until we see priority
> document online at Patent Center).
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241219/795197c7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241219/795197c7/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list