[Patentpractice] Who can sign assignment submissions?
Rick Neifeld
rneifeld at neifeld.com
Mon Feb 5 13:33:20 EST 2024
Judi -
1. "can non-attorneys sign the submissions?" - To avoid doubt, your
question is directed to signing an assignment cover sheet, not an
assignment. I am chagrined that my initial assumption to answering your
question was misplaced. I thought that ***anyone*** can sign an
assignment cover sheet. That may be true as a matter of PTO informal
practice, but I do not see that being authorized by the PTO rules and
guidance relating to signing an assignment cover sheet.
37 CFR 3.31 ("Cover sheet content"), subsection (a)(7) (sheet must
include "signature of the _party_ submitting the document"); and MPEP
302.07 ("Assignment Document Must Be Accompanied by a Cover Sheet")
states in part "For an assignment document filed electronically, the
signature of the person who signs the cover sheet must comply with*37
CFR 3.31(a)(7)
<https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-9020-appx-r.html#aia_d0e336415>*
or *37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)
<https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-9020-appx-r.html#d0e313174>*."
So (a)(7) requires the document be signed by a "party," which I
understand refers to an authorized representative of either an assignor
or an assignee. As a general matter of law, an attorney recognized as
representing a party can generally sign for their party, thereby binding
the party to whatever was signed. But the literal terms of the PTO rule
do not spell that issue out. MPEP 302.07 states that a signature on an
electronically filed cover sheet (which is the subject we are focusing
on here) can comply with *37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)
<https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-9020-appx-r.html#d0e313174>*
instead of being a "party." 1.7(d)92) is the rule authorizing
S-signatures. That does not provide clarification on who can sign. I
have not doubt that an attorney or record is authorized to sign an
assignment cover sheet. I have not thoroughly reviewed all possible
sections of the rules and MPEP and guidance. I suspect somewhere there
is further guidance, but that is all the time I am willing to spend
now. Hopefully, others will fill in the gaps I have left on this issue.
2. "send prepared submissions to the attorney for signature, we’re
trying to figure out how to submit assignments for recordation" - To
avoid doubt, I assume your question relates to the duty an attorney has
to review factual assertions for propriety before signing any document,
and therefore you want to know how, technically, an attorney can review
your factual entries, and upon confirming they are accurate, sign the
assignment cover sheet. So that requires providing the attorney access
at "step 8", the "Review" step, in the Assignment center's cover sheet
transmittal generation process. /See/ slide 52, Assignment Center Patent
Training Guide
<https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/assets/documents/patent_training_ac.pdf>
(PDF)
One way to do that is to provide the attorney of record control over
your computer, either physically accessing the GUI and data entry
elements or virtually controlling the GUI and data entry elements, such
as by a remote terminal session, or use of some service such as Zoom or
Teams, to review, correct as needed, and then submit, before turning
control back over to you.
Best regards, Rick Neifeld, Ph.D., Patent Attorney
Neifeld IP Law PLLC
9112 Shearman Street, Fairfax VA 22032-1479, United States
Office: 1-7034150012
Mobile: 1-7034470727
Fax: 1-5712810045
Email: rneifeld at neifeld.com
and richardneifeld at gmail.com
Web: https://neifeld.com/
This is a confidential communication of counsel. If you are not the
intended recipient, delete this email and notify the sender that you did so.
On 2/5/2024 12:19 PM, Goldberg, Judi via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> Since this lovely new assignment system won’t let us send prepared
> submissions to the attorney for signature, we’re trying to figure out
> how to submit assignments for recordation.The new system auto-fills
> the completer’s name etc., but can non-attorneys sign the
> submissions?It would make life easier…..
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Judi
>
> cid:image001.jpg at 01D52DCA.ACA5FA20
>
>
>
> Judith L. Goldberg | Patent Paralegal
>
> *Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. *
>
> Two Prudential Plaza, Suite 4900 | Chicago, IL 60601-6745
>
> P: (312) 552-3491 | F: (312) 616-5700
>
> jgoldberg at leydig.com <mailto:jgoldberg at leydig.com> | www.leydig.com
> <http://www.leydig.com/>
>
> The information contained in this communication is confidential and
> may contain information that is privileged and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the
> original and all copies of this communication. Thank you.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240205/7f68858d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2063 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240205/7f68858d/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rneifeld.vcf
Type: text/vcard
Size: 373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240205/7f68858d/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list