February 2024 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Feb 1 08:41:10 EST 2024
Ending: Thu Feb 29 16:35:06 EST 2024
Messages: 262

• [Patentpractice] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   William Ahmed
  • [Patentpractice] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Orvis
  • [Patentpractice] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   David Boundy
    • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Roger Browdy
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   David Boundy
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Roger Browdy
    • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Roger Browdy
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Katherine Koenig
    • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Margaret Polson
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Margaret Polson
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Doreen Trujillo
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Roger Browdy
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] two questions about the dreaded .DOCX situation   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: Four minutes will help us improve our website   Michael Brown
  • [Patentpractice] Fwd: Four minutes will help us improve our website   Richard Schafer
• [Patentpractice] Images from eGrant and downloaded patent have different pixelations   Gerry J. Elman
  • [Patentpractice] Images from eGrant and downloaded patent have different pixelations   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] some initial reactions to the USPTO's training slides for son-of-EPAS   Watt, Rachel S.
  • [Patentpractice] some initial reactions to the USPTO's training slides for son-of-EPAS   Bruce Young
  • [Patentpractice] FW: some initial reactions to the USPTO's training slides for son-of-EPAS   bruce at youngspatentservices.com
  • [Patentpractice] some initial reactions to the USPTO's training slides for son-of-EPAS   Suzannah K. Sundby
    • [Patentpractice] some initial reactions to the USPTO's training slides for son-of-EPAS   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] two blog posts about the DOCX problem   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Who can sign assignment submissions?   Goldberg, Judi
  • [Patentpractice] Who can sign assignment submissions?   Patent Lawyer
  • [Patentpractice] Who can sign assignment submissions?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] ChatGPT Redux -- run, don't walk [no question, just FYI]   Patent Lawyer
  • [Patentpractice] ChatGPT Redux -- run, don't walk [no question, just FYI]   George Jakobsche
• [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Roger Browdy
    • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Orvis
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Margaret Polson
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Maria Eliseeva
    • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Doreen Trujillo
  • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Bruce Young
    • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Michael Brown
    • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Chico Gholz
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Chico Gholz
      • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Sarah Adriano
  • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Randall Svihla
  • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   Jim Boff
    • [Patentpractice] Is it rude... and do you care   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Closing of the USPTO on January 16, 2024   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   bruce at youngspatentservices.com
  • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Andrea R. Jacobson
    • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Michael Dryja
      • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Victoria OConnor
  • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Jeffrey Semprebon
    • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Jeff Lindsay
    • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] New Patent Assignment Center Inoperable   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   James Katz
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Katherine Koenig
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Orvis
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Watt, Rachel S.
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center - can you save progress part way through? No   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] I predicted this defect in Assignment Center   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] I predicted this defect in Assignment Center   Randall Svihla
    • [Patentpractice] I predicted this defect in Assignment Center   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] I predicted this defect in Assignment Center   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] I predicted this defect in Assignment Center   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Off-topic - Regional Banks   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Time to get in your numbers for the 2023 US utility and plant patent toteboards   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Assignment Center on mobile   Richard Schafer
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center on mobile   Dan Feigelson
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center on mobile   Tim Ackermann
• [Patentpractice] Ass Center, B*, & Son-of-a... Notice of Non-Recordation   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] Ass Center, B*, & Son-of-a... Notice of Non-Recordation   Doreen Trujillo
    • [Patentpractice] Ass Center, B*, & Son-of-a... Notice of Non-Recordation   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] Ass Center, B*, & Son-of-a... Notice of Non-Recordation   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Maybe the USPTO will give a satisfactory answer on "auxiliary PDF"   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] Maybe the USPTO will give a satisfactory answer on "auxiliary PDF"   Krista Jacobsen
    • [Patentpractice] Maybe the USPTO will give a satisfactory answer on "auxiliary PDF"   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Maybe the USPTO will give a satisfactory answer on "auxiliary PDF"   Alan Taboada
    • [Patentpractice] Maybe the USPTO will give a satisfactory answer on "auxiliary PDF"   Neil R. Ormos
• [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Stanley H. Kremen
  • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   David Hricik
    • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Scott C. Sample
  • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Dan Feigelson
    • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Doreen Trujillo
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Rick Neifeld
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Sarah Adriano
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Doreen Trujillo
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Rick Neifeld
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Jim Boff
    • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Timothy Snowden
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] Third-Party exparte Challenge to Pending Application   Jeffrey Semprebon
• [Patentpractice] Ass. Center and Retrieving Filed Copies   Orvis
• [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   William Ahmed
  • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Bob Barber
    • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Dale Quisenberry
  • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Andrea R. Jacobson
  • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Scott Nielson
    • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Erin Geraghty
  • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] assignments not being recorded; now I need to file a statement under 3.73(c) for POA - pls advise!   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] USPTO acknowledges bug in Ass. Center   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Tech support failure at the Assignment Branch   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] ADS Adobe alteratives with templates?   Damon Neagle
  • [Patentpractice] ADS Adobe alteratives with templates?   Timothy Snowden
  • [Patentpractice] Friday Thought   Richard Straussman
    • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] Friday Thought   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
      • [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] Friday Thought   Weitzmanip
  • [Patentpractice] ADS Adobe alteratives with templates?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] Two year bar on Refunds when Expressly Abandoning Cases?   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
  • [Patentpractice] Two year bar on Refunds when Expressly Abandoning Cases?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] the 2023 toteboards   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Understanding the similarities and differences between U.S. § 120 benefit vs. Paris Convention Art. 4 priority vs. § 371 national phase   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Michael Dryja
    • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Scott Nielson
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Michael Dryja
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com)
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Allen Richter (allenr at richterpatent.com)
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Randall Svihla
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Patent Lawyer
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] Assignment Center -- stored contacts   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   Stanley H. Kremen
  • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   Jeffrey Semprebon
  • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   Judith S
  • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   David Boundy
    • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   David Hricik
    • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   Jeff Lindsay
      • [Patentpractice] Rejection under “102 or 103”   James E. Lake
• [Patentpractice] Authy Desktop App Sunset Notice, March 19, 2024   Rick Neifeld
  • [Patentpractice] Authy Desktop App Sunset Notice, March 19, 2024   Scott Nielson
    • [Patentpractice] Authy Desktop App Sunset Notice, March 19, 2024   Timothy Snowden
    • [Patentpractice] Authy Desktop App Sunset Notice, March 19, 2024   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] is this a PatentCenter new issue or an old one?   Tim Ackermann
  • [Patentpractice] is this a PatentCenter new issue or an old one?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Scott Nielson
    • [Patentpractice] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Scott Nielson
      • [Patentpractice] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Jeffrey Semprebon
      • [Patentpractice] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Timothy Snowden
  • [Patentpractice] [Pct] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Timothy Snowden
    • [Patentpractice] [Pct] Allowed EP patent -- opt between Unified Patent or country-by-country validation?   Jim Boff
• [Patentpractice] question on USPTO issued patent pdf   John Hammond
  • [Patentpractice] question on USPTO issued patent pdf   E. Victor Indiano
    • [Patentpractice] question on USPTO issued patent pdf   Shawn Smith
      • [Patentpractice] question on USPTO issued patent pdf   John Hammond
      • [Patentpractice] question on USPTO issued patent pdf   Weitzmanip
• [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   Andrew Berks
  • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   George Jakobsche
  • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   David Boundy
    • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   Bryan McWhorter
  • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   bill at eshelman.biz
    • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   Bryan McWhorter
  • [Patentpractice] Expansive MPEP Interpretation of 35 USC 102(b)(1) - not consistent with the statute; MPEP 2153.01(a)   Ron D. Katznelson
• [Patentpractice] Fed. Cir. Consideration of Prior Art   Stanley H. Kremen
  • [Patentpractice] Fed. Cir. Consideration of Prior Art   Bryan McWhorter
  • [Patentpractice] Fed. Cir. Consideration of Prior Art   Weitzmanip
    • [Patentpractice] Fed. Cir. Consideration of Prior Art   Stanley H. Kremen
• [Patentpractice] DOCX webinar on Wednesday   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Your help is needed - Pursuing rehearing and rehearing en banc in the “no more notice-and-comment needed” opinion   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Referral - Corporate counsel new AI software company?   Maria Eliseeva
  • [Patentpractice] Referral - Corporate counsel new AI software company?   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Suzannah K. Sundby
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Dan Feigelson
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Andrea R. Jacobson
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Neil R. Ormos
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Suzannah K. Sundby
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Doreen Trujillo
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Suzannah K. Sundby
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   John Hammond
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Katherine Koenig
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Neil R. Ormos
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Suzannah K. Sundby
    • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Krista Jacobsen
      • [Patentpractice] USPTO welcome letters   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx?   Hill, Jason
  • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx?   Catherine Van Houten
    • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx?   Scott Nielson
      • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx? (AND Auxiliary PDF version of Application)   Alan Taboada
      • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx? (AND Auxiliary PDF version of Application)   Masson, Roger M.
      • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx? (AND Auxiliary PDF version of Application)   Rick Neifeld
    • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx?   Suzannah K. Sundby
  • [Patentpractice] Preliminary Amendments in Docx?   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
• [Patentpractice] Credit card payment outage   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Credit card payment outage   Sarah Adriano
• [Patentpractice] Please respond to this survey about your use of USPTO’s DOCX e-filing paths   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] Please respond to this survey about your use of USPTO’s DOCX e-filing paths   Gerry J. Elman
    • [Patentpractice] Please respond to this survey about your use of USPTO’s DOCX e-filing paths   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   Doreen Trujillo
  • [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   Dan Feigelson
    • [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   John Hammond
  • [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   Neil R. Ormos
    • [Patentpractice] FW: Looking for a better understanding of how the patent system works?   Doreen Trujillo
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   Jim Larsen
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   Goldberg, Judi
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   Jim Larsen
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   Jacob Fritz
      • [Patentpractice] Correction of assignee on 85B?   pbrisky at fujitsu.com
• [Patentpractice] problem with getting PTO to recognize POAs from joint owners   Dan Feigelson
  • [Patentpractice] problem with getting PTO to recognize POAs from joint owners   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] problem with getting PTO to recognize POAs from joint owners   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] Ass Center doesn't find application   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Ass Center doesn't find application   Krista Jacobsen
    • [Patentpractice] Ass Center doesn't find application   Katherine Koenig
  • [Patentpractice] Ass Center doesn't find application   Carl Oppedahl
    • [Patentpractice] Ass Center doesn't find application   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   Russell Nugent
  • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   George Jakobsche
  • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   Jodi Lang
  • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   Jeffrey Semprebon
    • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   Russell Nugent
      • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   guyvmann at gvmlaw.net
  • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   David Boundy
  • [Patentpractice] EU referral needed   Ivan Rozek
• [Patentpractice] Survey results: How law firms and corporations are dealing with USPTO’s non-DOCX penalty   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Goldberg, Judi
  • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Dan Feigelson
    • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Randy A. Noranbrock
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Weitzmanip
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Judith S
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Scott Nielson
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Richard Schafer
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Carl Oppedahl
      • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Carl Oppedahl
  • [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question   Judith S
• [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Timothy Snowden
  • [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Timothy Snowden
    • [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Bruce Young
    • [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Scott Nielson
  • [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Rick Neifeld
    • [Patentpractice] Prior Art Question re: intersection of incorporation by reference and priority   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] application limit for micro entity status   Umair A. Qadeer
  • [Patentpractice] application limit for micro entity status   Rick Neifeld

Last message date: Thu Feb 29 16:35:06 EST 2024
Archived on: Sat Mar 30 20:40:05 EDT 2024

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...