[Patentpractice] Species restriction
Richard Straussman
rstraussman at weitzmanip.com
Tue Jun 10 14:03:57 UTC 2025
Thanks!
*Richard Straussman**
* *Senior Counsel*
* Registered Patent Attorney
* Member NY, NJ & CT Bars
*. . . . . . . . . . . . . .*
*Weitzman Law Offices, LLC*
*Intellectual Property Law*
425 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 401
Roseland, NJ 07068
*direct line* 973.403.9943
*main* 973.403.9940
*fax*973.403.9944
*e-mail*rstraussman at weitzmanip.com
*http://www.weitzmanip.com
*
On 6/10/2025 10:01 AM, David Boundy wrote:
> Yes, theoretically this is proper use of election of species (EoS is
> common for Markush groups, for instance).
>
> The main constraint is "mutually exclusive." So to change your hypo
> slightly, "wherein the writing instrument produces a black line or has
> a six-sided barrel" wouldn't be electable because those two aren't
> mutually exclusive.
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 9:39 AM Richard Straussman via Patentpractice
> <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Looking for some guidance. Is it proper for an examiner to
> issue a species restriction where all of the supposedly different
> species are present in the same dependent claim (as opposed to
> separate dependent claims)?
>
> For example, if claim 1 recites a "writing implement" and
> claim 2 says, "the system of claim 1, wherein the writing
> implement is one of a pencil or a ball point pen"? I am used to
> the type of species restriction issued involving , for example,
> claim 2 stating "the system of claim 1, wherein the writing
> implement is a pencil" and claim 3 stating "the system of claim 1,
> wherein the writing implement is a ball point pen."
>
> NOTE: I am not concerned with the propriety of such
> restrictions or the arguments that can be made against them (thank
> you David for your repeated guidance to the group on those
> points), only the specific situation where the supposed different
> species are all recited in the same claim.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Rich
>
> --
> *Richard Straussman**
> * *Senior Counsel*
> * Registered Patent Attorney
> * Member NY, NJ & CT Bars
> *. . . . . . . . . . . . . .*
> *Weitzman Law Offices, LLC*
> *Intellectual Property Law*
> 425 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 401
> Roseland, NJ 07068
> *direct line* 973.403.9943
> *main* 973.403.9940
> *fax*973.403.9944
> *e-mail*rstraussman at weitzmanip.com
>
> *http://www.weitzmanip.com
> *
>
>
>
> --
> Patentpractice mailing list
> Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250610/0679d496/attachment.html>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list