June 2025 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Jun 1 08:19:38 UTC 2025
Ending: Mon Jun 30 13:00:52 UTC 2025
Messages: 168

• [Patentpractice] "Patrick" Ombudsman strikes again   Krista Jacobsen
• [Patentpractice] [External Sender][Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Erin Geraghty
• [Patentpractice] [External Sender] Speaking of telephone calls   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] [External Sender] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] [External Sender] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] [External Sender] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Erin Geraghty
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] [Patentcenter] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] CAF (continuing application fee)   Jodi Lang
• [Patentpractice] CAF (continuing application fee)   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] can we get a REFUND --> we paid large entity fees could have paid small entity fees [US non-provisional]   William Ahmed
• [Patentpractice] can we get a REFUND --> we paid large entity fees could have paid small entity fees [US non-provisional]   Michael Nye
• [Patentpractice] claims listing for 312 amendment to claims AFTER "Notice of allowance with examiner's amendment"   William Ahmed
• [Patentpractice] claims listing for 312 amendment to claims AFTER "Notice of allowance with examiner's amendment"   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Customer Numbers   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Customer Numbers   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Customer Numbers   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] deposit account covers MOST of it but not enough funds   William Ahmed
• [Patentpractice] deposit account covers MOST of it but not enough funds   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] deposit account covers MOST of it but not enough funds   Jeffrey Semprebon
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Alysha A. Miller
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] FFL template   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Michael Brown
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Doreen Trujillo
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Ronni Jillions
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Irving Fishman
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] Fwd: USPTO to assess statutory penalties for false assertions or certifications of small and micro entity status   Sarah Adriano
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Krista Jacobsen
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Erin Geraghty
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Erin Geraghty
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Krista Jacobsen
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Linda Zaveta
• [Patentpractice] group letter (was venting - failure to download priority document from DAS)   Erin Geraghty
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place a telephone call to China?   Gerry Peters
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place international telephone calls? (was impossible to place a telephone call to China?)   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] impossible to place international telephone calls? (was impossible to place a telephone call to China?)   Gerry Peters
• [Patentpractice] IP cost estimator   Maria Eliseeva
• [Patentpractice] IP cost estimator   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   Alan Taboada
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   Masson, Roger M.
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   Alan Taboada
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Issued Claim Hypothetical - Definite? or Definitely Not?   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Is the PTO still sending "ceremonial" paper copies?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Is the PTO still sending "ceremonial" paper copies?   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Is the PTO still sending "ceremonial" paper copies?   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Is the PTO still sending "ceremonial" paper copies?   Dale Quisenberry
• [Patentpractice] Is the PTO still sending "ceremonial" paper copies?   John Pietrangelo
• [Patentpractice] job postings for patent examiners   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] job postings for patent examiners   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] job postings for patent examiners   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] Large Tables ASCII Format   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Large Tables ASCII Format   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Large Tables ASCII Format   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Large Tables ASCII Format   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] Large Tables ASCII Format   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Licensing data in pharma   Maria Eliseeva
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   Richard Straussman
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   Richard Straussman
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Odd Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   Masson, Roger M.
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   David Hricik
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   David Hricik
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   Jim Larsen
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] PPA Applicant Is Individual -- NPA Applicant to be LLC Assignee   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] PPA Applicant Is Individual -- NPA Applicant to be LLC Assignee   Dale Quisenberry
• [Patentpractice] PTO getting ridiculously stupid with form over substance   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] PTO getting ridiculously stupid with form over substance   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] PTO getting ridiculously stupid with form over substance   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Recommendation for software/app developer   Julie King
• [Patentpractice] Responding to a Rule 105 Request for Information   Daniel Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] Responding to a Rule 105 Request for Information   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] Responding to a Rule 105 Request for Information   Daniel Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] Responding to a Rule 105 Request for Information   Ron D. Katznelson
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] Revival of provisional application?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] Speaking of telephone calls   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Speaking of telephone calls   Robert Blaha
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Richard Straussman
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Malashaan Kind
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Richard Straussman
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Roger Browdy
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Species restriction   Masson, Roger M.
• [Patentpractice] Track I is painless? (was USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination)   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Track I is painless? (was USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination)   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] Track I is painless? (was USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination)   Dale Quisenberry
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Stanley H. Kremen
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Stanley H. Kremen
• [Patentpractice] USPTO discontinuing Accelerated Examination program for utility applications   Timothy Snowden
• [Patentpractice] USPTO Priority Document Shenanigans   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] USPTO Priority Document Shenanigans   Scott Nielson
• [Patentpractice] USPTO Priority Document Shenanigans   Suzannah K. Sundby
• [Patentpractice] USPTO Priority Document Shenanigans   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] What are our obligations to keep an applicant / assignee address current in the USPTO?   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] What are our obligations to keep an applicant / assignee address current in the USPTO?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] What are our obligations to keep an applicant / assignee address current in the USPTO?   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] What are our obligations to keep an applicant / assignee address current in the USPTO?   Patent Lawyer
• [Patentpractice] What are our obligations to keep an applicant / assignee address current in the USPTO?   Rick Neifeld
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Randall Svihla
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Dan Feigelson
• [Patentpractice] why do uspto programmers design inefficiency into the system?   Carl Oppedahl
• [Patentpractice] Would assignment affect patent validity?   Katherine Koenig
• [Patentpractice] Would assignment affect patent validity?   David Boundy
• [Patentpractice] Would assignment affect patent validity?   Scott Nielson

Last message date: Mon Jun 30 13:00:52 UTC 2025
Archived on: Mon Dec 29 19:46:27 UTC 2025

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...