[Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?

Wed Jun 11 14:09:17 UTC 2025

I agree with Roger with a small modification.  You could do it either way --
     -- either a joint representation engagement letter, joint Power of
Attorney, all the encumberments of a joint representation.
     -- a sole party representation, specifically called out in the
engagement letter.
Either way works.  The former will by yucky and inefficient for the rest of
time until the patent expires.  The latter will be a pain in the neck in
the short term, then smooth sailing.

But the practical implementation of the second one is kinda tricky.  How to
designate "applicant" so that an appointment from an assignee is sufficient
"person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter"
so that the PTO will recognize you?  I suggest a one-pager from the
owner/licensor that basically reiterates the  “be responsible for and shall
control the preparation, filing, prosecution, protection, defense and
maintenance of all claims relating to the Patent Rights [i.e., full
interest in several existing foreign patents] licensed hereunder which are
solely applicable to the Field of Use (“Licensee Claims”).” language.  Your
licensee wants to record the interest somehow.   So:
    1. get a one-pager parallel to the usual one-page short-form assignment
that you get for recording purposes to avoid recording the full agreement.
This one-pager shoudl include the license, any limits on revocation, and
the power to control prosecution (that is, all teh terms favorable to your
client that you don't want the licensor to renounce).
    2. Get the licensor's signature on that, record it.
    3. Get the Power of Attorney from your licensee.
    4. Change "applicant"  (which typically requires the Change of
Applicant, Notice of Recordation, 3.73 Statement, and Power of Attorney
filed as a single filing).

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 9:48 AM Masson, Roger M. via Patentpractice <
patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> Jim,
>
>
>
> I haven’t had this situation in patent prosecution but the representation
> agreement should spell out that you do not represent Licensor assuming you
> decide to represent only Licensee, which I would be inclined to go with to
> avoid issues when the parties disagree on something.
>
>
>
> *Roger *
>
> *Masson*
>
> Senior Counsel
>
> *Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP*
>
> 151 North Franklin Street, Suite 2500
>
> ,
>
> Chicago
>
> ,
>
> IL
>
>
>
> 60606
>
> *O:* 312-704-3516
>
>  |
>
> *F: 312-704-3001*
>
> RMasson at hinshawlaw.com
>
> My Bio <https://www.hinshawlaw.com/professionals-roger-masson.html>
>
>  |
>
> hinshawlaw.com
>
>  |
>
> [image: Hinshaw LinkedIn Page] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/17618/>
>
> [image: Hinshaw Facebook Page] <https://www.facebook.com/hinshawlaw/>
>
> [image: Hinshaw Twitter Page] <https://twitter.com/hinshaw>
>
> <https://www.instagram.com/hinshawlaw/>
>
> [image: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP] <http://www.hinshawlaw.com/>
>
> <https://www.hinshawlaw.com/newsroom-news-hinshaw-90-year-anniversary.html>
>
>
> <https://www.hinshawlaw.com/newsroom-news-hinshaw-2023-2024-mansfield-rule-certification-trendsetter-firm.html>
>
>
>
> *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Jim Larsen via Patentpractice
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2025 10:04 PM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
> advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Jim Larsen <jim at larsen-ip.com>
> *Subject:* [Patentpractice] PoA/Representation of licensee and licensor?
>
>
>
> Dear Listmates, I have a question of first impression (for me) regarding
> power of attorney. A new client (Licensee) has, by license agreement,
> agreed to solely “be responsible for and shall control the preparation,
> filing, prosecution, protection,
>
> Dear Listmates,
>
>
>
> I have a question of first impression (for me) regarding power of
> attorney.
>
>
>
> A new client (Licensee) has, by license agreement, agreed to solely “be
> responsible for and shall control the preparation, filing, prosecution,
> protection, defense and maintenance of all claims relating to the Patent
> Rights [i.e., full interest in several existing foreign patents] licensed
> hereunder which are solely applicable to the Field of Use (“Licensee
> Claims”).”  Note: Licensor is currently a part owner of Licensee.
>
>
>
> The agreement also requires that Licensor have a chance to review the text
> of each patent application “relating to Licensee Claims” before filing, and
> “Licensee shall give Licensor the opportunity to provide comments
> concerning the preparation, filing, prosecution, protection, defense and
> maintenance of the Licensee Claims, and shall give reasonable consideration
> to such comments….”
>
>
>
> Acknowledging the potential breadth of “relating to” language, the license
> agreement was reportedly hard-fought, was executed before we got involved,
> and is not likely to change.  So, my question regards power of attorney and
> (joint?) representation.  I think we needn’t represent the Licensor, and
> Licensor’s “opportunity to provide comments” does not necessarily require
> us to directly communicate with Licensor.  Is it nevertheless advisable to
> get POA and conflicts waiver from both Licensor and Licensee? Or, since
> Licensor is a part owner of Licensee, would POA from and representation of
> Licensee be sufficient?
>
>
>
> I see these and other variations as each having pluses and minuses, but I
> bet some of you have dealt with a similar situation.  What works best?
> Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP is an Illinois registered limited liability
> partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform
> Partnership Act (1997).
>
> The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended
> solely for the addressee(s) named in this message. This communication is
> intended to be and to remain confidential and may be subject to applicable
> attorney/client and/or work product privileges. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in
> error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete
> this message and its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this
> message and/or any attachments and if you are not the intended recipient,
> do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the
> information contained in this communication or any attachments.
> --
> Patentpractice mailing list
> Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
>

-- 

<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>

*David Boundy *| Partner | Potomac Law Group, PLLC

P.O. Box 590638, Newton, MA  02459

Tel (646) 472-9737 | Fax: (202) 318-7707

*dboundy at potomaclaw.com <dboundy at potomaclaw.com>* | *www.potomaclaw.com
<http://www.potomaclaw.com>*

Articles at http://ssrn.com/author=2936470 <http://ssrn.com/author=2936470>
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>

Click here to add me to your contacts.
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2084 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2091 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1397 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11099 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 39131 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 45183 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250611/73de75d1/attachment-0006.jpg>