[Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools

Carl Oppedahl carl at oppedahl.com
Mon Oct 27 21:09:17 UTC 2025 

I apparently misunderstood an earlier communication from a fellow 
listserv member.  I have reinstated Mr. Keim on the listserv.

Carl

On 10/27/2025 4:22 PM, Scott Nielson via Patentpractice wrote:
> I don't think Ben Keim was sending advertisements or solicitations.
>
> The first email in this chain (not from Ben) asked for 
> "recommendations for AI patent portfolio evaluation tools."
>
> Ben replied by listing a tool provided by Tangible IP. I cannot find 
> any connection between Ben and the company he recommended.
>
> Ben is a patent attorney with Newport IP (Our Professionals - Newport 
> IP Law Firm <https://newportip.com/professionals>) and has posted many 
> times on the listserve. For example, on 20 Oct 2025 he posted the 
> following:
>
>     I just heard from a SPE that:
>
>      Acting Commissioner Valencia Martin Wallace sent out instructions
>     today to the examiners that they are required to conduct
>     interviews when they are requested by the applicant in order to
>     further prosecution. Hopefully, you and all other practitioners
>     don't experience a detrimental impact.
>
>     -Ben
>
> I think you have misjudged Ben and should reinstate him as a member of 
> the listserve.
>
> And, for the record, I do not know Ben other than his posts on the 
> listserve. I just feel like he is being unfairly maligned.
>
> *Scott Nielson*
>
> 801-660-4400
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on 
> behalf of Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice 
> <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 2:05 PM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek 
> legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
> Thank you Suzannah for drawing this to my attention.
>
> Mr. Keim has been unsubscribed from the Patent Practice listserv, and 
> has been banned from resubscribing.
>
> On 10/27/2025 3:19 PM, Suzannah K. Sundby via Patentpractice wrote:
>
>     Imo, the only person who should be able to send advertisements and
>     solicitations on this listserv is Carl…
>
>     I will make it a point to avoid engaging the services of anyone
>     else who does…
>
>     Suzannah K. Sundby <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/> *|* Partner
>
>     _canady + lortz LLP <http://www.canadylortz.com/>_
>
>     1050 30th Street, NW
>
>     Washington, DC 20007
>
>     T: 202.486.8020
>
>     F: 202.540.8020
>
>     suzannah at canadylortz.com <mailto:suzannah at canadylortz.com>
>
>     www.canadylortz.com <http://www.canadylortz.com/>
>
>     Confidentiality Notice:  This message is being sent by or on
>     behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual
>     or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may
>     contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
>     confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you
>     are not the named addressee, you may not read, print, retain,
>     copy, or disseminate this message or any part.  If you have
>     received this message in error, please notify the sender
>     immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
>
>     *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>
>     <mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf Of
>     *Benjamin Keim via Patentpractice
>     *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 3:14 PM
>     *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
>     legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
>     <mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
>     *Cc:* Benjamin Keim <ben at newportip.com>
>     <mailto:ben at newportip.com>; Umair A. Qadeer <umair at qadeerip.com>
>     <mailto:umair at qadeerip.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
>     The people at Tangible IP have the following to say about one AI tool.
>
>     *AI Tools: The One We Prefer*
>
>     Like most of you, we’ve been inundated with demos from various
>     patent analytics and evidence of use search platforms that claim
>     to replace seasoned analysts. While none truly eliminate the need
>     for human expertise, we found that Limestone|Report stands out as
>     the most practical solution we’ve encountered, at a price most can
>     afford.
>
>     What sets Limestone|Report apart is its ability to provide a
>     comprehensive view of portfolio pedigree while effectively
>     identifying potential infringers. The platform delivers near
>     real-time, actionable insights across Enforceability,
>     Infringement, and Economics for portfolios of any size –
>     capabilities that have proven invaluable in our day-to-day practice.
>
>     We’ve been so impressed with the results that we’re now
>     incorporating Limestone|Report into all our represented portfolios.
>
>     What about you? Well, our good friends at Techson IP have agreed
>     to extend special pricing to our readers so that you can try it
>     for yourself. You will receive a 20% discount off their standard
>     pricing  on your first project through 12/31/2025 * if you use
>     this link <https://www.techsonip.com/tangibleip>.
>
>     -Ben
>
>     *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com
>     <mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> *On Behalf Of
>     *Umair A. Qadeer via Patentpractice
>     *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 7:48 AM
>     *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
>     legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
>     <mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>>
>     *Cc:* Umair A. Qadeer <umair at qadeerip.com <mailto:umair at qadeerip.com>>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
>     Greetings all,
>
>     I was asked by a client with a reasonably sized patent portfolio
>     about AI tools for patent portfolio valuation. I have never used
>     such tools, but I was able to identify several via a Google
>     search. Does anyone have experience with any of the following:
>
>     •              PricePatent
>
>     •              Patentelligence
>
>     •              Toolip Valuation
>
>     •              XLSCOUT
>
>     •              Patlytics
>
>     •              Orbit Intelligence
>
>
>     or have other recommendations for AI patent portfolio evaluation
>     tools?
>
>     Thanks in advance for your input!
>
>     Best,
>
>     Umair
>
>     -----
>
>     Umair A. Qadeer
>
>     Registered Patent Attorney
>
>     Qadeer LLC
>
>     312.248.3020
>
>     umair at qadeerip.com <mailto:umair at qadeerip.com>
>
>     www.qadeerip.com <http://www.qadeerip.com/>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251027/e878d7a6/attachment.html>

More information about the Patentpractice mailing list