[Pct] Ex Officio Changes to the Request form

Carl Oppedahl carl at oppedahl.com
Mon Nov 27 18:31:43 EST 2023


Did you use ePCT to generate the Request and the zip file?  Was your 
applicant client located outside of the US?


On 11/27/2023 3:26 PM, Russell Nugent via Pct wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> I filed a PCT application in the USPTO (client's decision not mine) 
> and I have gotten some confusing correspondence back.  The USPTO made 
> ex officio changes that I can object to.  The first change was that 
> all of the inventors that were listed as Inventors only have been 
> changed to inventors and applicants.  Can anyone think of a reason 
> they would decide on their own end that the inventors are applicants too?
>
> They then rejected my POA as not being signed by all of the applicants.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/pct_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231127/9e284ebf/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/pct_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231127/9e284ebf/attachment.p7s>


More information about the Pct mailing list