[E-trademarks] FW: Proposed trademark fees changes for fiscal year 2025, and translation requirement
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Tue Mar 26 13:03:08 EDT 2024
Yes I have had several times over the years when an Examiner plugged our
coined-word mark into Google and got a hit, and this hit became the
supposed proof that the word is supposedly a word in some non-English
language. And so we go around and around on this. Worse yet, the
Examiner takes our coined-work mark and breaks it up into two supposed
components and somehow manages to find some non-English language in
which the two components, taken individually, are supposedly words.
Typically what I eventually do is respond along these lines ...
The mark is "qwertyuiop". The Examiner requires that the applicant
provide a translation statement for purported words qwerty and uiop
in the <obscure> language. As required by the Examiner, applicant
hereby states that qwerty in the <obscure> language may be
translated into the English word "purple" and that uiop in the
<obscure> language may be translated into the English word
"monkey". Applicant denies, however, that "qwertyuiop" is a word in
any non-English language.
And yes, the price of admission to this annoying exercise will
apparently become $100.
On 3/26/2024 9:48 AM, Laura A. Genovese via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> I am wondering how people feel about #14, the requirement to translate
> non-English wording. What if the client has a made-up word, but the
> Examiner puts it into Google translate and sees that in some language,
> what is believed to be a made-up word might be a real word. Is there
> any room to argue that the mark is a made-up word, or acronym? Or must
> we just pay the surcharge?
>
> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Gordon, Michael via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2024 4:32 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Gordon, Michael <Michael.Gordon at cfraresearch.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] FW: Proposed trademark fees changes for
> fiscal year 2025
>
> The NPRM lists 20 elements that are required for a “base application,”
> and failure to provide these would trigger the $100 fee.
>
> (1) The applicant’s name and domicile address;
>
> (2) The applicant’s legal entity;
>
> (3) The citizenship of each individual applicant, or the state or
> country of incorporation or organization of each juristic applicant;
> (4) If the applicant is a domestic partnership, the names and
> citizenship of the general partners, or if the applicant is a domestic
> joint venture, the names and citizenship of the active members of the
> joint venture;
>
> (5) If the applicant is a sole proprietorship, the state of
> organization of the sole proprietorship and the name and citizenship
> of the sole proprietor;
>
> (6) One or more bases for filing that satisfy all the requirements of
> § 2.34. If more than one basis is set forth, the applicant must comply
> with the requirements of § 2.34 for each asserted basis;
>
> (7) If the application contains goods and/or services in more than one
> class, compliance with § 2.86;
>
> (8) A filing fee for each class of goods and/or services, as required
> by § 2.6(a)(1)(ii) or (iii);
>
> (9) A verified statement that meets the requirements of § 2.33, dated
> and signed by a person properly authorized to sign on behalf of the
> owner pursuant to § 2.193(e)(1);
>
> (10) If the applicant does not claim standard characters, the
> applicant must attach a digitized image of the mark. If the mark
> includes color, the drawing must show the mark in color;
>
> (11) If the mark is in standard characters, a mark comprised only of
> characters in the Office's standard character set, typed in the
> appropriate field of the application;
>
> (12) If the mark includes color, a statement naming the color(s) and
> describing where the color(s) appears on the mark, and a claim that
> the color(s) is a feature of the mark;
>
> (13) If the mark is not in standard characters, a description of the
> mark;
>
> (14) If the mark includes non-English wording, an English translation
> of that wording;
>
> (15) If the mark includes non-Latin characters, a transliteration of
> those characters;
>
> (16) If the mark includes an individual’s name or likeness, either (i)
> a statement that identifies the living individual whose name or
> likeness the mark comprises and written consent of the individual, or
> (ii) a statement that the name or likeness does not identify a living
> individual (see section 2(c) of the Act);
>
> (17) If the applicant owns one or more registrations for the same
> mark, and the owner(s) last listed in Office records of the prior
> registration(s) for the same mark differs from the owner(s) listed in
> the application, a claim of ownership of the registration(s)
> identified by the registration number(s), pursuant to § 2.36;
>
> (18) If the application is a concurrent use application, compliance
> with § 2.42;
>
> (19) An applicant whose domicile is not located within the United
> States or its territories must designate an attorney as the
> applicant’s representative, pursuant to § 2.11(a), and include the
> attorney’s name, postal address, email address, and bar information; and
>
> (20) Correctly classified goods and/or services, with an
> identification of goods and/or services from the Office's Acceptable
> Identification of Goods and Services Manual within the electronic form.
>
> Want to petition to keep the domicile address out of the record? $100
> fee, plus the petition fee. Client LLC representative enters “owner”
> instead of “member” on the signature line? $100 fee, depending on the
> examiner. (TMEP § 611.06(g) says that “owner” should be okay, but
> sometimes they decide otherwise.) Description of the mark not exact
> enough for the examiner? $100 fee. Miss a prior registration when
> citing prior relevant registrations? $100 fee. I also wonder if you
> can respond to the office action calling for the $100 fee to argue
> against the $100 fee or if the only way to argue against it would be a
> petition to the director…for a $400 fee.
>
> A picture containing person, person, wall, indoor Description
> automatically generatedA picture containing text, screen Description
> automatically generated <https://www.cfraresearch.com/>
>
>
>
> *Michael R. Gordon***
>
> Assistant General Counsel
>
> /Licensed to practice only in Maryland, North Carolina, and the
> District of Columbia/
>
> michael.gordon at cfraresearch.com <mailto:michael.gordon at cfraresearch.com>
>
> o: +1.646.517.2461 <tel:+1.646.517.2461>
>
> *Clients First • Integrity • Courage • Excellence***
>
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cfra-research/>Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/cfraresearch>YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/@CFRAResearch>
>
> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Ronni Jillions via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2024 4:06 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Ronni Jillions <RSJillions at browdyneimark.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] FW: Proposed trademark fees changes for
> fiscal year 2025
>
> *CAUTION: EXTERNAL MESSAGE *
>
> I wonder what the USPTO will consider “insufficient information”. Is
> that going to be imposed when in a first action, the examiner decides
> the description needs to be amended?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ronni
>
> Ms. Ronni S. Jillions
>
> *Browdy and Neimark, PLLC*
>
> Intellectual Property Law
>
> 1625 K St., N.W.
>
> Suite 550
>
> Washington, D.C. 20006
>
> Tel: 202-628-5197
>
> Direct: 202-628-5217
>
> Fax: 202-737-3528
>
> Cell: 703-856-2226
>
> *rsjillions at browdyneimark.com*
>
> Please copy all instructions to mail at browdyneimark.com to ensure
> proper handling
>
> **
>
> *CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION*
>
> This communication is intended only for the use of the above addressee
> and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> use, distribution, disclosure, discussion or copying of this
> communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please delete and destroy all copies immediately and please
> reply to notify our office.
>
> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Tim Ackermann via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2024 3:55 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Tim Ackermann <tim at ackermannlaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] FW: Proposed trademark fees changes for
> fiscal year 2025
>
> Here we go: merge TEAS/TEAS+, but use the higher $350/class rate. Then
> add add'l fees on top:
>
> TMIDM does not contain appropriate goods/services for your client? You
> pay $200!
>
> Office decides you didn't supply "sufficient" information? You pay $100!
>
> Tim Ackermann
>
> The Ackermann Law Firm
>
> E: tim at ackermannlaw.com
> P: 817.305.0690
> F: 214.453.0810
> W: ackermannlaw.com <http://ackermannlaw.com/>
> O: 1701 W. Northwest Hwy. Ste. 100
> Grapevine TX 76051
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:22 PM Richard Morris via E-trademarks
> <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> *From: *"U.S. Patent and Trademark Office"
> <subscriptioncenter at subscriptions.uspto.gov>
> *Reply-To: *"U.S. Patent and Trademark Office"
> <subscriptioncenter at subscriptions.uspto.gov>
> *Date: *Monday, March 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM
> *To: *Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
> *Subject: *Proposed trademark fees changes for fiscal year 2025
>
> Submit comments by May 28
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDAsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vY29udGVudC5nb3ZkZWxpdmVyeS5jb20vYWNjb3VudHMvVVNQVE8vYnVsbGV0aW5zLzM5MjA4MGMiLCJidWxsZXRpbl9pZCI6IjIwMjQwMzI1LjkyMzQ1NDcxIn0.psMqAQt5zRq3NSYYiOxLRYTBg-iTN49VcrM535tHiVE/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>.
>
>
> Trademark Alert
>
>
>
> US Patent and Trademark Office
>
>
> Proposed trademark fees changes for fiscal year 2025
>
>
> Submit comments by May 28
>
> As part of our regular assessment of fees under our fee-setting
> authority, we are proposing certain adjustments necessary to
> efficiently and effectively administer the U.S. trademark system.
> These fees provide our agency with the ability to implement
> programs and initiatives driving our 2022–2026 Strategic Plan,
> including developing news ways to fight fraud, supporting our
> employees and stakeholders with reliable IT infrastructure, and
> enhancing our work to reduce pendency. Our proposed changes to the
> trademark fees can be found in a notice of proposed rulemaking
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDEsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZlZGVyYWxyZWdpc3Rlci5nb3YvcHVibGljLWluc3BlY3Rpb24vMjAyNC0wNjE4Ni9zZXR0aW5nLWFuZC1hZGp1c3RpbmctdHJhZGVtYXJrLWZlZXMtZHVyaW5nLWZpc2NhbC15ZWFyLTIwMjU_dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPXN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbmNlbnRlciZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0mdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fbmFtZT0mdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1nb3ZkZWxpdmVyeSZ1dG1fdGVybT0iLCJidWxsZXRpbl9pZCI6IjIwMjQwMzI1LjkyMzQ1NDcxIn0.6N6BzCNHLozdKzmJULC_AsyXGnfWMf2N4-MoN7g_vAk/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
> (NPRM) that will officially publish tomorrow in the Federal
> Register. An NPRM on proposed patent fee changes is forthcoming.
>
> “This trademark fee proposal thoughtfully promotes efficient
> operations, adjusts for higher operating costs, and sufficiently
> finances ongoing and planned initiatives that optimize our service
> to American entrepreneurs,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for
> Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO Kathi Vidal.
>
> Our trademark fee proposal provides additional resources to enable
> us to deliver high-quality and timely trademark examination and
> review proceedings that produce accurate and reliable trademark
> rights for domestic and international stakeholders. It also
> enables us to spend additional efforts to declutter the trademark
> register and address fraud that impacts American entrepreneurs.
> The rule will enable the USPTO to accomplish our mission to drive
> U.S. innovation, inclusive capitalism, and global competitiveness.
>
> Our proposal is shaped by public feedback we’ve received
> throughout the past several months, beginning with a public
> hearing
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDIsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnVzcHRvLmdvdi9hYm91dC11cy9ldmVudHMvdHJhZGVtYXJrLXB1YmxpYy1hZHZpc29yeS1jb21taXR0ZWUtZmVlLXNldHRpbmctaGVhcmluZz91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.sR0Vb7d49oExZWy6Io2glAinCovdv3yvWhoQ37-vT_0/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
> in June 2023 hosted by our Trademark Public Advisory Committee
> (TPAC). Following the hearing, TPAC provided our agency with a
> written report detailing the public comments received and its
> recommendations regarding the proposed fees. We considered and
> analyzed all comments and feedback to create this proposal.
>
> To learn more about the USPTO’s proposed fee changes, please visit
> our Fee Setting and Adjusting page
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDMsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnVzcHRvLmdvdi9hYm91dC11cy9wZXJmb3JtYW5jZS1hbmQtcGxhbm5pbmcvZmVlLXNldHRpbmctYW5kLWFkanVzdGluZz91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSN0bWZlZS1pbmZvIiwiYnVsbGV0aW5faWQiOiIyMDI0MDMyNS45MjM0NTQ3MSJ9.T3sWIFYh4ROhvaHXhdZj2KGcZkkmj9kPuLjil4MK-BU/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>.
> Written comments on the proposed trademark fee changes in the NPRM
> can be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDQsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJlZ3VsYXRpb25zLmdvdi8_dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPXN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbmNlbnRlciZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0mdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fbmFtZT0mdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1nb3ZkZWxpdmVyeSZ1dG1fdGVybT0iLCJidWxsZXRpbl9pZCI6IjIwMjQwMzI1LjkyMzQ1NDcxIn0.nfNOBjSfBXty2pcE0LdYcD-3SVExbckciNumnWcmv4Q/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
> using docket number PTO-T-2022-0034 by May 28.
>
> facebook
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDUsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZmFjZWJvb2suY29tL3VzcHRvLmdvdj91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.cNtYESHOIfsvYvHY1pep3hPqTrSAE3RpAOK40W5r28I/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>twitter
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDYsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS91c3B0bz91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.rxGseA4_VFmf0vFNDyq6XmyKKpoQQFB-31X6c1AGdDY/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>youtube
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDcsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly95b3V0dWJlLmNvbS91c3B0b3ZpZGVvP3V0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1zdWJzY3JpcHRpb25jZW50ZXImdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9JnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX25hbWU9JnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9Z292ZGVsaXZlcnkmdXRtX3Rlcm09IiwiYnVsbGV0aW5faWQiOiIyMDI0MDMyNS45MjM0NTQ3MSJ9.l89weBwbOam0rfUpWMe03CZoP4d5g9KaLHlBcLRe7vA/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>linkedin
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDgsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly9saW5rZWRpbi5jb20vY29tcGFueS91c3B0bz91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.VUf0qZ0YLhWB6SERjOb0ErxT_vEN5HqhskzfT3MCM1E/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
>
> Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates.
>
> Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDksInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudXNwdG8uZ292L3N1YnNjcmliZT91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.on0pLzVEMOfG4HtOhHqrb8K7jeK54chYjjhjkxRN_jM/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
> to update or change your email preferences.
>
> This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us,
> please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMTAsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudXNwdG8uZ292L2Fib3V0L2NvbnRhY3RzP3V0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1zdWJzY3JpcHRpb25jZW50ZXImdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9JnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX25hbWU9JnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9Z292ZGVsaXZlcnkmdXRtX3Rlcm09IiwiYnVsbGV0aW5faWQiOiIyMDI0MDMyNS45MjM0NTQ3MSJ9.oDd_K9g6oYkh4ptthwzA8bx5_BqK9cBTYW3wrAwzGcE/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>.
> To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices,
> please modify your email filters to allow mail from
> subscriptioncenter at subscriptions.uspto.gov
> <mailto:subscriptioncenter at subscriptions.uspto.gov>.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email was sent to richard at 4trademark.com using GovDelivery
> Communications Cloud on behalf of: United States Patent and
> Trademark Office ·600 Dulany Street · Alexandria , VA 22314
>
>
>
> GovDelivery logo
> <https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMTEsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vc3Vic2NyaWJlcmhlbHAuZ3JhbmljdXMuY29tLz91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249c3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uY2VudGVyJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PSZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9uYW1lPSZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWdvdmRlbGl2ZXJ5JnV0bV90ZXJtPSIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyNDAzMjUuOTIzNDU0NzEifQ.6E9kSaZ4wu-MTP9kXvzWvXdYDiLJ7kwAoXHpddFrDcQ/s/532765906/br/239555935206-l>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 107626 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1104 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6605 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1513 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1645 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1510 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 40100 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240326/d29c2b4a/attachment.p7s>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list