[E-trademarks] Domains not Transferred After UDRP Decision

trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
Wed Jul 30 13:21:06 UTC 2025


Agreed. The ICANN compliance department should get this unstuck.


Best regards,

Marc Trachtenberg
Chair, Internet, Domain Name, eCommerce, and Social Media Practice
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
77 West Wacker Drive
Chicago,IL 60613
(O) +1.312.456.1020
(M) +1.773.677.3305
Trac at gtlaw.com
________________________________
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of Doug Isenberg via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2025 7:33:34 AM
To: 'For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice.' <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Doug Isenberg <doug at giga.law>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Domains not Transferred After UDRP Decision

*EXTERNAL TO GT*


I don’t have a human contact, but I’ve had success corresponding with this address: udrp at name.com<mailto:udrp at name.com>.  You seem to be doing all of the right things.  Unfortunately, some registrars are more difficult than others, but in my experience, filing an ICANN Contractual Compliance complaint gets the job done.



Douglas M. Isenberg | The GigaLaw Firm

Attorney at Law

Phone: 1-404-348-0368

Email: Doug at Giga.Law<mailto:Doug at Giga.Law>

Web: www.Giga.Law<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.giga.law/__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTvZYYWEL$>

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/dougisenberg<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougisenberg__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTjUO3mdQ$>





From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Orvis PC via E-trademarks
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2025 8:27 AM
To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
Cc: Orvis PC <orvispc at gmail.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Domains not Transferred After UDRP Decision



We filed a UDRP proceeding with WIPO for about 15 domains registered with Name.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://Name.com__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTmiLrje5$>. We won! But, I did not receive the transfer email from Name.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://Name.com__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTmiLrje5$> 10 days after the decision. It has been about a month. I have sent multiple reminders. Name.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://Name.com__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTmiLrje5$>, WIPO and ICANN (the emails copied on the decision email) have not responded to any of my emails. I just submitted a complaint to ICANN. And no, emails are not stuck in my spam folder.



Does anyone have a human contact at Name.com?<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://Name.com?__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!GQQM4er7qNilVi2g0z6KgRRf1UPivv5szgsNLUEsT2ueumANXsEUQRnmd2-yfXpLIQK5Eha_cqUbF-gS9prY9IgMTkKP3MbY$> Any other ideas?



Thank you in advance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250730/7f317416/attachment.html>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list