[Patentpractice] Law firm name on patent

David Boundy PatentProcedure at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 20:15:59 UTC 2025


I agree with Tim.  Zero legal significance.  It's just branding.   Kind of
equivalent to the way you see the attorney signature on drawings of old
patents.

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:14 PM Timothy Snowden via Patentpractice <
patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> I don't know about 'best'. To the best of my knowledge there's no specific
> USPTO rules addressing that question (someone may know better than I do). I
> always thought the primary role was one of 'branding' (for you and the
> client) -- so the most important thing is a consistent use of whatever
> name. I will say I have often seen relatively major law firms (as well as
> many small ones) that use some sort of a trade name on the front of the
> patent.
> ------------------------------
> *TIMOTHY D. SNOWDEN*
> Certified Patent Practitioner | Certified Licensing Professional
>
>
> *254-346-1763 <+12543461763> | tdsnowden at outlook.com
> <tdsnowden at outlook.com> linkedin.com/in/timothy-snowden
> <https://linkedin.com/timothy-snowden>*
>
> *Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any
> attachments is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or
> taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities
> other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.*
> On 1/9/2025 2:07 PM, Katherine Koenig via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> When listing your firm for printing on the patent, is it ok (advisable?
> Are there pitfalls?) to use only a DBA name that’s been registered with the
> state, or must the entity’s legal name also be shown?  For example, if the
> DBA is Awesome IP and the law firm legal name is Brown & Partners, PA),
> which is the better option?:
>
>
>
>    1. Awesome IP;
>    2. Awesome IP d/b/a Brown & Partners, PA; or
>    3. Brown & Partners, PA
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Katherine
>
>
>
> Dr. Katherine Koenig
>
> *Registered Patent Attorney*
>
> Koenig IP Works, PLLC
>
> 2208 Mariner Dr.
>
> Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
>
> (954) 903-1699
>
> katherine at koenigipworks.com
>
>
>
> *Targeted Intellectual Property Strategy*
>
>
>
> *The information contained in this communication, including any
> attachments, is privileged and confidential information intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity named above.  If **you are not the
> intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, do not read
> it.  Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this
> communication in error and then destroy all paper and electronic copies.
> Thank you.*
>
>
>
> --
> Patentpractice mailing list
> Patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com
>


-- 


*       [image: Cambridge Technology Law LLC]
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>*

Listed as one of the world's 300 leading intellectual property strategists
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>

Articles at http://ssrn.com/author=2936470 <http://ssrn.com/author=2936470>
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>

Click here to add me to your contacts.
<https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?>

* David Boundy
<https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy>*

DBoundy at cambridgetechlaw.com <dboundy at cambridgetechlaw.com> / +1
646.472.9737 <%2B1%206464729737>

Cambridge Technology Law LLC
686 Massachusetts Avenue #201, Cambridge  MA  02139
http://www.CambridgeTechLaw.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/DavidBoundy
mailing address
PO Box 590638
Newton MA   02459

This communication is a confidential attorney-client communication intended
only for the person named above or an authorized representative.  Any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited, whether by the author or recipients.  Any legal, business or
tax information contained in this communication, including attachments and
enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific
issues, nor a substitute for a formal opinion, nor is it sufficient to
avoid legal or other adverse consequences to the recipient. Unless you are
the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not
copy, use, disclose or distribute this communication or attribute to the
Firm any information contained in this communication. If you have received
this communication in error, please advise the sender by replying to this
message or by telephone, and then promptly delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250109/ed65ea88/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7679 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250109/ed65ea88/attachment.png>


More information about the Patentpractice mailing list