[Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Tue Oct 28 00:43:59 UTC 2025
We are a community, and I benefit again and again from inputs to members
of the community. Thank you everyone.
Carl
On 10/27/2025 6:00 PM, Randall Svihla wrote:
>
> This is a good result.
>
> *From:*Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
> Behalf Of *Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 5:09 PM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
> I apparently misunderstood an earlier communication from a fellow
> listserv member. I have reinstated Mr. Keim on the listserv.
>
> Carl
>
> On 10/27/2025 4:22 PM, Scott Nielson via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> I don't think Ben Keim was sending advertisements or solicitations.
>
> The first email in this chain (not from Ben) asked for
> "recommendations for AI patent portfolio evaluation tools."
>
> Ben replied by listing a tool provided by Tangible IP. I cannot
> find any connection between Ben and the company he recommended.
>
> Ben is a patent attorney with Newport IP (Our Professionals -
> Newport IP Law Firm <https://newportip.com/professionals>) and has
> posted many times on the listserve. For example, on 20 Oct 2025 he
> posted the following:
>
> I just heard from a SPE that:
>
> Acting Commissioner Valencia Martin Wallace sent out
> instructions today to the examiners that they are required to
> conduct interviews when they are requested by the applicant in
> order to further prosecution. Hopefully, you and all other
> practitioners don't experience a detrimental impact.
>
> -Ben
>
> I think you have misjudged Ben and should reinstate him as a
> member of the listserve.
>
> And, for the record, I do not know Ben other than his posts on the
> listserve. I just feel like he is being unfairly maligned.
>
> *Scott Nielson*
>
> 801-660-4400
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of
> Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
> <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 2:05 PM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Carl Oppedahl <carl at oppedahl.com> <mailto:carl at oppedahl.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
> Thank you Suzannah for drawing this to my attention.
>
> Mr. Keim has been unsubscribed from the Patent Practice listserv,
> and has been banned from resubscribing.
>
> On 10/27/2025 3:19 PM, Suzannah K. Sundby via Patentpractice wrote:
>
> Imo, the only person who should be able to send advertisements
> and solicitations on this listserv is Carl…
>
> I will make it a point to avoid engaging the services of
> anyone else who does…
>
> Suzannah K. Sundby <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/>
> *|* Partner
>
> _canady + lortz LLP <http://www.canadylortz.com/>_
>
> 1050 30th Street, NW
>
> Washington, DC 20007
>
> T: 202.486.8020
>
> F: 202.540.8020
>
> suzannah at canadylortz.com
>
> www.canadylortz.com <http://www.canadylortz.com/>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent by or on
> behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is proprietary,
> privileged or confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from
> disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you may not
> read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message or any
> part. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies
> of the message.
>
> *From:* Patentpractice
> <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Benjamin Keim via Patentpractice
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 3:14 PM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to
> seek legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> <mailto:patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Benjamin Keim <ben at newportip.com>
> <mailto:ben at newportip.com>; Umair A. Qadeer
> <umair at qadeerip.com> <mailto:umair at qadeerip.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
> The people at Tangible IP have the following to say about one
> AI tool.
>
> *AI Tools: The One We Prefer*
>
> Like most of you, we’ve been inundated with demos from various
> patent analytics and evidence of use search platforms that
> claim to replace seasoned analysts. While none truly eliminate
> the need for human expertise, we found that Limestone|Report
> stands out as the most practical solution we’ve encountered,
> at a price most can afford.
>
> What sets Limestone|Report apart is its ability to provide a
> comprehensive view of portfolio pedigree while effectively
> identifying potential infringers. The platform delivers near
> real-time, actionable insights across Enforceability,
> Infringement, and Economics for portfolios of any size –
> capabilities that have proven invaluable in our day-to-day
> practice.
>
> We’ve been so impressed with the results that we’re now
> incorporating Limestone|Report into all our represented
> portfolios.
>
> What about you? Well, our good friends at Techson IP have
> agreed to extend special pricing to our readers so that you
> can try it for yourself. You will receive a 20% discount off
> their standard pricing on your first project through
> 12/31/2025 * if you use this link
> <https://www.techsonip.com/tangibleip>.
>
> -Ben
>
> *From:* Patentpractice
> <patentpractice-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf Of
> *Umair A. Qadeer via Patentpractice
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2025 7:48 AM
> *To:* For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to
> seek legal advice. <patentpractice at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Umair A. Qadeer <umair at qadeerip.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I was asked by a client with a reasonably sized patent
> portfolio about AI tools for patent portfolio valuation. I
> have never used such tools, but I was able to identify several
> via a Google search. Does anyone have experience with any of
> the following:
>
> • PricePatent
>
> • Patentelligence
>
> • Toolip Valuation
>
> • XLSCOUT
>
> • Patlytics
>
> • Orbit Intelligence
>
>
> or have other recommendations for AI patent portfolio
> evaluation tools?
>
> Thanks in advance for your input!
>
> Best,
>
> Umair
>
> -----
>
> Umair A. Qadeer
>
> Registered Patent Attorney
>
> Qadeer LLC
>
> 312.248.3020
>
> umair at qadeerip.com
>
> www.qadeerip.com <http://www.qadeerip.com/>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20251027/d74a731e/attachment.html>
More information about the Patentpractice
mailing list